| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bundessozialgericht | testentscheidung | 03.01.2025 | Bundessozialgericht | testentscheidung | 03.01.2025 | Bundessozialgericht | testentscheidung | 03.01.2025 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Januar 2025 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 AS 1750/24 ER | 25.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2547/24 ER-B | 04.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 P 877/23 ER | 25.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 1662/23 ER-B | 27.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 405/23 | 11.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2336/23 | 18.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||
| S 8 VG 2490/20 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 2886/23 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. Dezember 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 AS 1960/22 | 11.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2669/23 | 17.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 882/23 | 11.12.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 51 KR 1038/23 | 28.11.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KR 1451/23 | 11.12.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 32 KR 654/22 | 25.04.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 20. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 60 KR 334/22 | 24.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 291/23 | 11.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 28/23 R | 28.08.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Dezember 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 SO 3290/17 | 20.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3379/21 | 07.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 KR 1708/21 | 29.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2180/22 | 20.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 KR 2602/24 ER | 09.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2706/24 ER-B | 12.12.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 32 KR 118/20 | 29.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 141/22 | 17.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 648/18 | 16.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 108/21 | 14.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 61 KR 647/18 | 27.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 52/21 | 14.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 729/24 ER | 17.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 272/24 B ER | 14.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 BA 180/19 | 16.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 22/22 | 10.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 2069/22 | 14.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 135/24 | 19.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 224 BA 19/21 | 20.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 65/22 | 21.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 2013/19 | 10.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 41/22 | 20.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 37 AS 1823/18 | 24.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 447/23 | 20.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 37 AS 1823/18 | 24.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 447/23 | 20.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 220 SF 7/24 DS ER | 06.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 SV 17/24 B ER | 21.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 1 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 1 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 1 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 0, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161876 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2025-01-03 12:52:41 [post_date_gmt] => 2025-01-03 11:52:41 [post_content] => [post_title] => testentscheidung [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => testentscheidung [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2025-01-03 12:52:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2025-01-03 11:52:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/?post_type=entscheidung&p=161876 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161244 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2547/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2547-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2547-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 1662/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-1662-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-1662-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 2336/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-2336-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-2336-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161236 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 2886/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-2886-23-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-2886-23-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2669/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2669-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2669-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150404 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 882/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-882-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-882-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 51 KR 1038/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-51-kr-1038-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-51-kr-1038-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 1451/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-1451-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-1451-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 KR 965/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-kr-965-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-kr-965-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 28/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-28-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:23:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:23:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-28-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3379/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3379-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3379-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161231 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2180/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2180-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2180-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2706/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2706-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2706-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 141/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-141-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-141-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 108/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-108-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-108-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 52/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-52-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-52-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 272/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-272-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-272-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129883 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 22/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-22-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-22-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129881 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 135/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-135-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-135-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 65/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-65-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-65-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 41/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-41-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-41-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 447/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-447-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-447-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 447/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-447-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-447-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SV 17/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sv-17-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sv-17-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161876 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2025-01-03 12:52:41 [post_date_gmt] => 2025-01-03 11:52:41 [post_content] => [post_title] => testentscheidung [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => testentscheidung [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2025-01-03 12:52:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2025-01-03 11:52:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/?post_type=entscheidung&p=161876 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0581a0514af81965f9a9d54c645de36b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.