| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 5/22 | 11.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 1407/18 | 16.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 49/19 | 09.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 10 R 520/18 | 12.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 75/20 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 6 AS 2164/22 ER | 21.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1820/22 B ER, L 12 AS 1825/22 B | 30.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 86 AS 378/20 | 23.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1454/22 | 31.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 3 AS 4623/18 | 16.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 378/20 | 14.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 47 AS 911/20 | 16.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 827/21 | 14.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 AS 372/22 ER | 02.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 80/23 B ER | 16.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 53 AS 5885/19 | 13.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1372/22 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 129 AS 15278/17 | 08.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 311/19 | 27.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 4 AS 2237/17 | 06.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 1920/19 | 19.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 14/22 R | 21.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Oktober 2023 |
| - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 P 8/20 KL | 20.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 7/22 R | 19.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 U 353/15 | 05.11.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 185/19 | 16.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 1/23 R | 27.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 203/21 | 27.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 24. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 27/23 ER | 08.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 24. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 160/23 | 18.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 15 AS 1051/10 | 01.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 135/17 | 15.06.2018 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 3 U 144/20 | 26.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 U 88/22 | 17.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 2 U 13/13 | 16.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 253/18 | 04.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 73 U 70/20 | 23.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 117/22 | 20.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 73 U 70/20 | 23.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 117/22 | 20.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 3 U 11/19 | 25.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 19/22 | 19.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||
| - | - | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||||||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 46 KR 160/22 | 06.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 20. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 319/16 | 01.03.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 19. Oktober 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 100 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 100 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 100 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 87 KA 5/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-87-ka-5-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-87-ka-5-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149485 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 49/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-49-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-49-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149481 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 75/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-75-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-75-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149476 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1820/22 B ER, L 12 AS 1825/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1820-22-b-er-l-12-as-1825-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1820-22-b-er-l-12-as-1825-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1454/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1454-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1454-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 378/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-378-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-378-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 827/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-827-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-827-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149456 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 80/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-80-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-80-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1372/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1372-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1372-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 311/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-311-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-311-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 14/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-14-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-14-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 7/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-7-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-7-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 1/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-1-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-1-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 203/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-203-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-203-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 27/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-27-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-27-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140355 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 160/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-160-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-160-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139086 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 135/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-135-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-135-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 88/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-88-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-88-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 253/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-253-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-253-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 117/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-117-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-117-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 117/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-117-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-117-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 19/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-19-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-19-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 VS 39/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-vs-39-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-vs-39-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 KR 160/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-kr-160-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-kr-160-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Entscheidung S 10 U 319/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => entscheidung-s-10-u-319-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/entscheidung-s-10-u-319-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 87 KA 5/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-87-ka-5-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-87-ka-5-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9da6a5bf8c84f533969bf562cd353a20 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:94ec1af4338c9ac9d1127aacf3856666:0.56408000 1747289172 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.