| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 42 SO 74/16 | 20.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 227/19 | 23.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 12/22 R | 17.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 42 AS 2918/17 | 28.11.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 498/21 | 24.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 3/22 R | 21.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 VK 2541/21 | 06.05.2013 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VK 1152/23 | 05.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 SB 2016/21 | 03.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 2273/23 | 05.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 1819/22 | 17.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1485/23 | 25.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 U 1995/21 | 01.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 954/23 | 25.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 414/15 | 08.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 18/18 | 05.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 8 KR 474/18 | 14.12.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 44/21 | 25.07.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 20 AS 3/05 ER | 01.02.2005 | - | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 11 AS 118/21 | 13.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 11 AS 4/20 | 13.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 14 KR 167/22 | 03.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 3 BA 43/19 | 02.05.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 15 R 669/21 | 01.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 141/22 | 08.03.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | 14 KR 1197/20 | 11.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 17. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 20/23 ER | 13.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 16. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 63 KR 2227/20 | 27.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 78/22 B D | 20.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 SF 2/22 R | 29.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 30 BA 210/18 | 10.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 153/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 6/21 R | 13.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 KA 3206/13 | 18.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 4152/18 | 28.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 8/22 R | 24.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Schwerin | S 3 KA 6/15 | 10.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 1 KA 2/18 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 5/22 R | 19.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 R 993/19 | 31.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 2204/21 | 18.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 U 1544/20 | 26.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 3039/21 | 14.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 1067/17 | 02.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 2169/20 | 24.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 KR 3949/18 | 28.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3580/20 | 22.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 15 KR 3863/21 | 29.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2158/22 | 29.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Oktober 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 101 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 101 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 101 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2500, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 12/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-12-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-12-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 3/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-3-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-3-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VK 1152/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vk-1152-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vk-1152-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 2273/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-2273-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-2273-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1485/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1485-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1485-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 954/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-954-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-954-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 18/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-18-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-18-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 44/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-44-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-44-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 3/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-3-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-3-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 118/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-118-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-118-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 167/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-167-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-167-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 BA 43/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-ba-43-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-ba-43-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 R 669/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-r-669-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-r-669-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => 14 KR 1197/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => 14-kr-1197-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/14-kr-1197-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 20/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-20-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-20-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87998 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 SF 2/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-sf-2-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-sf-2-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 6/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-6-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-6-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 8/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-8-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-8-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87995 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 5/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-5-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-5-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 2204/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-2204-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-2204-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 3039/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-3039-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-3039-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 2169/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-2169-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-2169-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3580/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3580-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3580-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2158/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2158-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2158-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 12/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-12-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-12-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3057a83e49b844c8cea09a00f9487a7c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f00f1251def7bf1af9f724d70f3b8a62:0.82096500 1747324001 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.