| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 SF 282/23 E | 20.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 11. Oktober 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 11 KR 506/17 | 31.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 315/21 | 19.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 15/23 B | 04.09.2023 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 11. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 56/20 | 26.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 3/22 | 19.04.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 25 KR 490/21 | 09.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 7/21 DS | 26.01.2022 | B 1 SF 1/22 R | 06.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2023 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 224/20 | 22.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 453/21 | 24.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 224/20 | 22.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 453/21 | 24.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 19 BA 19/19 | 29.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 72/22 | 27.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 7/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 10. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 19 BA 19/19 | 29.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 72/22 | 27.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 7/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 10. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 KR 3247/18 | 27.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1768/20 | 25.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 AY 3417/22 ER | 27.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 335/23 ER-B | 04.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 VG 2208/22 | 08.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 1744/23 | 14.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 VG 390/22 | 29.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 2379/22 | 14.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 P 175/19 | 22.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 34/21 | 09.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 4/23 AR | 25.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 U 908/16 | 16.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 457/21 | 09.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 30/22 B | 12.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 62/17 | 18.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 675/19 | 06.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 50/23 B | 12.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 68 KR 2993/21 | 02.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 671/22 NZB | 11.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 8/23 AR | 28.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 VG 17/15 | 30.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 28/21 | 25.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 34 KR 2133/22 ER | 01.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 138/23 B ER | 09.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 5/23 AR | 28.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 SF 116/21 EK SB | 31.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 1/23 R | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 10 U 130/20 | 10.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 218/20 | 30.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 137/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 10 SO 71/21 | 23.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 231/22 | 25.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 5/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 20 SO 182/20 | 30.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 240/21 | 15.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 3/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 45 R 826/16 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 356/22 WA | 09.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 137/22 AR | 24.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 45 R 826/16 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 356/22 WA | 09.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 137/22 AR | 24.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 20 SO 122/16 | 08.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 233/20 | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 103 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 103 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 103 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2550, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 SF 282/23 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-sf-282-23-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-sf-282-23-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 315/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-315-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-315-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 3/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-3-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-3-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 SF 1/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-sf-1-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-sf-1-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 224/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-224-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-224-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 453/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-453-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-453-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 BA 19/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ba-19-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ba-19-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 72/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-72-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-72-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1768/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1768-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1768-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 335/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-335-23-er-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-335-23-er-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159585 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 1744/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-1744-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:10:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:10:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-1744-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 2379/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-2379-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-2379-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 34/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-34-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-34-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 457/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-457-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-457-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 675/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-675-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-675-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 671/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-671-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-671-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 28/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-28-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-28-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 138/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-138-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-138-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 116/21 EK SB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-116-21-ek-sb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-116-21-ek-sb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 218/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-218-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-218-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 231/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-231-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-231-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 240/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-240-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-240-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 356/22 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-356-22-wa-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-356-22-wa-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 356/22 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-356-22-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-356-22-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 233/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-233-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-233-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 SF 282/23 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-sf-282-23-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-sf-282-23-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 963b07cc4d37a29f39058b5a04612356 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f30660d522ccfe3b06769eed8568a67b:0.17630100 1747327674 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.