| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SB 1684/19 | 17.12.2021 | L 12 SB 104/22 | 18.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. September 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 U 3299/20 | 28.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 2065/22 | 24.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 21 R 2242/21 | 15.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 2620/22 | 21.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 881/19 | 18.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 474/22 | 18.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 18 KR 946/22 ER | 06.03.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 361/23 B ER | 04.09.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 203 AS 5825/20 | 09.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 142/23 B PKH | 05.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 494/21 ZV zuvor S 24 R 494/21 ZV | 23.05.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 289/23 ZV | 21.09.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 864/18 ZV | 03.03.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 113/23 ZV | 21.09.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 864/18 ZV | 03.03.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 113/23 ZV | 21.09.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 27 P 104/19 | 04.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 14/21 | 08.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 3/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 AL 55/21 | 27.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 136/22 | 30.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 1651/17 | 20.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 120/18 | 02.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 45/21 R, B 5 R 243/21 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 SO 27/23 | 13.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 23 KR 86/19 | 27.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 16 KR 78/23 | 05.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 52/22 | 22.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 241/16 | 03.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 549/20 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 14 KR 818/21 | 21.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 27. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 18 AS 331/16 | 27.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 52/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 44 AY 44/20 | 28.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AY 19/22 | 01.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 KR 326/22 | 29.03.2023 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 18/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 14 AS 125/21 | 10.05.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 302/21 | 18.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 65/23 BH | 03.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 36 AS 1011/16 | 07.02.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 26/20 | 11.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 86/21 R | 06.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 11 R 416/16 | 15.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 R 130/18 | 24.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 7/21 R | 13.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 6 R 90/19 | 27.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 337/20 | 04.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 14/21 R | 06.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. September 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 105 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 105 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 105 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 104/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-104-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-104-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 2065/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-2065-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-2065-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2620/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2620-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2620-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 474/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-474-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-474-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 361/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-361-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-361-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 142/23 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-142-23-b-pkh-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-142-23-b-pkh-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161414 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 289/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-289-23-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-289-23-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 113/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-113-23-zv-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-113-23-zv-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 113/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-113-23-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-113-23-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 14/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-14-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-14-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 136/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-136-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-136-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149317 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 120/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-120-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-120-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 27/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-27-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-27-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KR 86/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kr-86-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kr-86-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 KR 78/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-kr-78-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-kr-78-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 52/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-52-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-52-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 241/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-241-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-241-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 818/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-818-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-818-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 52/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-52-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-52-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 19/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-19-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-19-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 326/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-326-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-326-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AS 125/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-as-125-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-as-125-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 86/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-86-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-86-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87990 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 7/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-7-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-7-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 14/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-14-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-14-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 104/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-104-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-104-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 456d940556bc5b7a09e2f427158794fd [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:16cb56986226047aef0c74c48c1970f0:0.25904700 1747481027 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.