| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 211/21 | 21.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 26. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 188/20 | 26.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 293/21 | 20.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 87/23 B | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 26. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 188/20 | 26.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 293/21 | 20.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 87/23 B | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 26. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 16 KR 83/21 | 17.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 319/22 | 09.08.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 R 100/20 | 05.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 2569/21 | 21.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 R 3072/18 | 05.05.2021 | L 8 R 2322/21 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 AL 489/20 | 13.06.2022 | L 8 AL 2142/22 | 21.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 3 AL 900/21 | 04.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 1648/22 | 21.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 1463/18 | 17.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1620/20 | 21.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 SB 1197/20 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 1416/22 | 23.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 R 921/23 ER | 26.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1333/23 ER-B | 05.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 R 3111/22 | 13.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1260/23 B | 29.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 12 SB 84/20 | 11.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 167/22 | 04.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 128 AS 2711/23 ER | 19.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 627/23 B ER | 23.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 24 SB 125/20 | 19.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 229/23 WA | 17.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 215/14 | 26.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 11/18 | 02.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 22/22 R | 19.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 15 KR 1024/17 | 19.11.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 10/20 | 12.07.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 30 KR 967/14 | 14.03.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 146/19 | 14.06.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 U 534/17 | 25.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 19. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 60 R 96/22 | 08.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 SF 6/23 B (R) | 14.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 20 AY 3/23 ER | 26.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AY 16/23 B ER | 20.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 36 U 274/16 | 28.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 136/20 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 55 AS 675/18 | 23.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 360/21 | 04.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 9 SO 111/17 | 30.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 45/20 | 18.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 11/22 B | 06.10.2022 | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 18. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 6 SO 81/20 | 25.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 132/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 18. September 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 106 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 106 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 106 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 211/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-211-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-211-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 188/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-188-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-188-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 293/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-293-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-293-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 319/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-319-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-319-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159541 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2569/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2569-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2569-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2322/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2322-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2322-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 2142/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-2142-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-2142-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 1648/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-1648-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-1648-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1620/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1620-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1620-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 1416/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-1416-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-1416-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1333/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1333-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1333-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159517 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1260/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1260-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:09:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:09:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1260-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 167/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-167-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-167-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 627/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-627-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-627-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 229/23 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-229-23-wa-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-229-23-wa-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 22/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-22-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-22-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 10/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-10-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-10-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 146/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-146-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-146-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143488 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 U 534/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-u-534-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-u-534-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SF 6/23 B (R) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sf-6-23-b-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sf-6-23-b-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139045 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 16/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-16-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-16-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139037 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 136/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-136-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-136-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 360/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-360-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-360-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 111/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-111-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-111-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 SO 81/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-so-81-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-so-81-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 211/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-211-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-211-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6cb79795e76b223ff2fe90d9def3062e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f12bfab4b7bc300c28f0b35156ec03ec:0.77618500 1747349407 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.