| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 739/16 | 29.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 7/20 | 22.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 9/23 R | 28.08.2024 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 8. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 739/16 | 29.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 7/20 | 22.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 9/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 8. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 10 R 520/18 | 12.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 75/20 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 1631/19 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 148/22 | 24.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 1657/21 | 22.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 273/22 | 12.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 17 AY 2/17 | 26.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 AY 6/22 | 28.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 1 U 5011/23 | 25.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 7. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 379/19 | 10.08.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 36/21 | 14.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 11 R 2153/15 | 11.07.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 BA 134/19 | 12.05.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AS 290/20 | 27.07.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 417/22 | 25.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 39 AL 657/15 | 19.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 72/20 | 21.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 6 R 688/14 | 02.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 363/21 | 26.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 28 KR 115/23 ER | 12.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 205/23 B ER | 16.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 597/16 | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 447/20 | 29.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 60/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 3473/18 | 29.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 60/22 WA | 19.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 8/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 247/18 | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 32/20 | 14.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 23/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 139/20 | 09.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 126/21 | 07.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 19/22 KL | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. September 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 9 SO 137/20 | 07.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 46/22 NZB | 29.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 9 SO 137/20 | 07.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 46/22 NZB | 29.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 11 R 522/16 | 28.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 R 109/18 | 23.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 36/21 R | 05.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 140 AS 9989/17 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 802/19 | 20.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 5/22 R | 06.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 50 KR 1678/16 | 28.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 316/19 | 09.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 7/22 R | 19.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 16 KR 173/20 | 19.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 211/20 | 04.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 35/21 R | 04.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 59 KR 1987/19 | 24.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 637/20 | 22.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 14/22 R | 11.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. September 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 108 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 108 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 108 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 7/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-7-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-7-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 739/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-739-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-739-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 75/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-75-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-75-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 148/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-148-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-148-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 273/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-273-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-273-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161740 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 6/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-6-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-6-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 5011/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-5011-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-5011-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 36/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-36-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-36-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 134/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-134-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-134-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130826 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 417/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-417-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-417-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129183 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 72/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-72-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-72-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 363/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-363-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-363-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 205/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-205-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-205-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 447/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-447-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-447-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 60/22 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-60-22-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-60-22-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 32/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-32-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-32-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 126/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-126-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-126-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 19/22 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-19-22-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-19-22-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 46/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-46-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-46-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 46/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-46-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-46-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 36/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-36-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-36-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 5/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-5-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-5-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 7/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-7-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-7-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 35/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-35-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-35-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 14/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-14-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-14-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 7/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-7-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-7-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a9d3797779ef42d13652a87fcfde781f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:37cb3a65ac7a580b37a6359efd43046b:0.38501300 1747363307 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.