| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 173/17 | 18.04.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 49/18 | 06.06.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 5. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 18 R 1271/20 | 21.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 446/22 | 24.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 34 R 531/18 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 488/22 | 22.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 R 1362/14 | 05.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 997/17 | 16.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 9 R 296/21 | 27.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 878/22 | 14.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 18/23 AR | 11.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 82 R 418/20 | 17.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 30/22 | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 27 AS 11/23 ER | 10.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 145/23 B | 10.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 14 R 78/15 | 10.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 66/22 | 12.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 19 AS 1048/19 | 21.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 51/22 | 16.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 192/22 BH | 23.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 4. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 19 AS 1048/19 | 21.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 51/22 | 16.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 192/22 BH | 23.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 4. September 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 SF 28/20 E | 28.04.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 140/20 | 11.08.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. September 2023 | ||
| Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 9/23 B ER LSG | 26.04.2023 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 65/23 E | 31.07.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 1. September 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 22 AS 1005/22 ER | 29.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 12/23 B ER | 02.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 23 U 28/17 | 12.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 29/21 | 01.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 34 AS 2300/14 | 30.03.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 549/15 | 22.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 6 AS 2523/18 | 23.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 88/20 NZB | 24.09.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 25 KR 433/18 | 15.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 174/20 | 14.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 44 SB 1220/17 | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 42/20 | 27.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 48 VU 40/17 | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VU 53/19 | 17.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 14 AS 108/23 ER | 22.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 AS 314/23 B ER | 28.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 132 SB 1895/18 | 30.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 210/20 | 31.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 118 VE 89/16 | 24.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VE 43/18 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 24 SB 224/16 | 29.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 168/19 | 06.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 41/21 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 30 BA 38/19 | 08.05.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BA 15/20 | 27.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 12/23 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 BA 90/18 | 25.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BA 14/19 | 15.11.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. August 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 109 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 109 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 109 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2700, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 49/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-49-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-49-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 446/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-446-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-446-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 488/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-488-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-488-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 997/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-997-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-997-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 878/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-878-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-878-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 30/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-30-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-30-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 145/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-145-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-145-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 66/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-66-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-66-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 51/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-51-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-51-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 1048/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-1048-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-1048-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130825 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 140/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-140-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-140-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 65/23 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-65-23-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-65-23-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 12/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-12-23-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-12-23-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 29/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-29-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-29-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 549/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-549-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-549-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161736 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 88/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-88-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-88-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 174/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-174-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-174-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 42/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-42-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-42-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129154 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VU 53/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vu-53-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vu-53-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 AS 314/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-as-314-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-as-314-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 210/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-210-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-210-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VE 43/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-ve-43-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-ve-43-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 168/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-168-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-168-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 15/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-15-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-15-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161404 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 14/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-14-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-14-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 49/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-49-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-49-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2fe7ac1ca472f30f097ff997934b52a6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8570eb8cfb53548fea73907a582cd8f3:0.45634300 1747377386 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.