| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 105/21 | 28.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 275/22 | 02.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 2662/19 | 15.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 28/24 | 07.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 193 KR 1120/17 | 16.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 8/22 | 04.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 117 AS 3604/15 | 09.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 50/20 | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 3/23 R | 17.07.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. November 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 32 AS 1997/22 | - | L 19 AS 943/23 | 18.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 107/24 ER | 03.06.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 359/24 B ER | 13.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 25 KR 1008/18 | 23.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 894/22 | 21.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 KR 7/24 KH ER | 22.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 243/24 B ER | 17.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 BK 25/19 | 30.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 BK 8/23 | 26.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 16 KR 2478/21 | 10.10.2024 | L 5 KR 352/24 | 15.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 52 KR 335/24 ER | 25.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 308/24 B ER | 18.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 44 R 2015/17 | 20.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 428/23 | 19.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 U 213/22 | 30.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 239/23 | 19.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 80/24 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 24 KR 2168/21 | 23.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 557/22 | 07.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 12 P 196/23 | 09.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 169/23 | 04.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 47 KR 1051/22 | 21.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 238/24 | 11.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 21 KR 335/23 | 29.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 335/23 | 10.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 KR 960/21 | 09.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 11. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 50 R 156/20 | 07.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 445/23 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1445/19 | 16.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 65/22 | 26.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 41 AL 136/18 | 18.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 9/22 | 07.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AS 2297/21 | 16.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 102/23 | 30.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AS 2297/21 | 16.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 102/23 | 30.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 74 SV 64/24 ER | 03.06.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 SV 7/24 B ER | 29.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 74 SV 150/23 | 03.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 SV 11/24 B | 05.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 11 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 11 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 11 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 275/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-275-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-275-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 28/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-28-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-28-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 8/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-8-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-8-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 3/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-3-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-3-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 943/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-943-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-943-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 359/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-359-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-359-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 894/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-894-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-894-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150976 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 243/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-243-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-243-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150975 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BK 8/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-bk-8-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-bk-8-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 352/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-352-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-352-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 308/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-308-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-308-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 428/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-428-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-428-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150966 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 239/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-239-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-239-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 557/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-557-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-557-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 169/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-169-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-169-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 238/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-238-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-238-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150959 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 335/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-335-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-335-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 KR 960/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-kr-960-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-kr-960-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 445/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-445-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-445-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 65/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-65-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-65-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 9/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-9-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-9-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129783 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 102/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-102-23-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-102-23-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 102/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-102-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-102-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SV 7/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sv-7-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sv-7-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SV 11/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sv-11-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sv-11-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 275/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-275-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-275-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5cf61a23b519d633f2d5c583b5f2e439 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.