| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 KR 537/17 | 05.04.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BA 22/18 | 22.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 44 KR 809/18 | 14.07.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 420/20 | 22.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 430/15 | 13.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 13/21 | 10.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 415/15 | 13.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 12/21 | 10.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 429/15 | 13.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 11/21 | 10.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 406/15 | 13.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 10/21 | 10.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AS 1339/17 | 31.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 334/21 | 22.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 29 SO 31/18 | 31.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 27/21 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 30 AS 10/23 ER | 16.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 122/23 B ER | 04.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 R 12/22 | 08.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 310/22 | 26.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 29 AS 31/23 ER | 16.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 128/23 B ER | 23.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 R 443/17 | 22.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 161/20 | 21.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 32/23 AR | 06.07.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 29. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 221 KR 2753/21 | 14.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 28. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 2080/20 | 08.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 297/21 KH | 01.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 19 AS 367/23 ER | 28.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 524/23 B ER | 08.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 43 SO 309/22 ER | 21.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 350/22 B ER, L 9 SO 351/22 B | 27.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 14 KR 2064/16 | 20.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 642/21 | 16.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 12 AL 287/22 ER | 17.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 210/22 B ER, L 9 AL 211/22 B | 16.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 27 SO 297/19 | 09.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 259/21 | 19.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 AS 881/22 ER | 09.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 310/23 B ER | 13.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 17 AS 682/19 | 24.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 378/22 | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 KR 1188/19 | 23.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 173/22 KH | 18.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 AS 434/20 | 15.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 603/21 | 31.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 3 P 227/19 | 26.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 11/21 | 19.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 8/23 AR | 19.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 41 SO 42/20 | 17.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 387/21 | 16.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 4/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. August 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 110 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 110 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 110 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 22/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-22-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-22-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 420/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-420-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-420-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161735 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 13/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-13-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-13-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 12/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-12-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-12-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 11/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-11-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-11-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161732 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 10/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-10-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-10-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 334/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-334-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-334-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 27/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-27-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-27-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 122/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-122-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-122-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 310/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-310-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-310-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 128/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-128-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-128-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136975 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 161/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-161-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-161-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 221 KR 2753/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-221-kr-2753-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-221-kr-2753-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 297/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-297-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-297-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 524/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-524-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-524-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 350/22 B ER, L 9 SO 351/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-350-22-b-er-l-9-so-351-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-350-22-b-er-l-9-so-351-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149263 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 642/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-642-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-642-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 210/22 B ER, L 9 AL 211/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-210-22-b-er-l-9-al-211-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-210-22-b-er-l-9-al-211-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 259/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-259-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-259-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 310/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-310-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-310-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 378/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-378-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-378-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 173/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-173-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-173-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 603/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-603-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-603-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 11/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-11-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-11-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 387/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-387-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-387-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 22/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-22-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-22-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 252464896d24091e830f12143db58c29 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9144c45e4832fd76179ea3be1cf1cff8:0.50278500 1747374729 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.