| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 11 BA 59/23 ER | 23.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 25. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 19 R 444/22 | 21.12.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 60/23 | 26.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 24/23 BH | 07.07.2023 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 25. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 36 U 366/22 | 25.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 24. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 36 U 407/22 | 13.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 24. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 AL 410/20 | 20.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 105/21 | 07.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 24. August 2023 | ||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 80/23 | 18.07.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 24. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 12 SF 17/23 E | 10.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 24. August 2023 | ||||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 459/22 | 25.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 24. August 2023 | ||||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 219/22 | 25.07.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 24. August 2023 | ||||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 303/23 | 04.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 24. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 9 VE 5/21 | 28.06.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 VE 4/21 | 12.06.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 44 KR 2747/19 | 30.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 366/20 | 25.01.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 22 AS 595/09 | 14.03.2011 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 219/11 | 26.09.2012 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 23. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 145/21 | 23.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 31/22 | 08.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 20 KR 43/17 | 08.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 456/20 | 24.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 20/22 R | 29.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 3 BA 25/18 | 10.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 6 BA 15/20 | 17.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 4/21 R | 13.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 28 AL 80/17 | 28.11.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 6/18 | 16.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 38/21 R | 06.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 503/20 | 04.12.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 6/21 | 18.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 9/21 R | 23.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 12 SO 21/15 | 14.12.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 30/18 | 11.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 8/21 R | 23.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 296/17 | 12.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 155/20 | 13.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 4/22 R | 23.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 |
| - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 P 14/20 KL | 20.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 6/22 R | 19.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 34 AS 3528/14 | 30.03.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 550/15 | 22.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 4 AS 3954/15 | 26.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 92/20 | 22.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 U 123/17 | 04.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 100/19 | 30.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 23 U 47/13 | 14.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 117/17 | 12.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. August 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 111 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 111 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 111 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 BA 59/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ba-59-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ba-59-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140353 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 R 444/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-r-444-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-r-444-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143484 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 U 366/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-u-366-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-u-366-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143480 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 U 407/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-u-407-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-u-407-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AL 410/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-al-410-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-al-410-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 80/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-80-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-80-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SF 17/23 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sf-17-23-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sf-17-23-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 459/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-459-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-459-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 219/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-219-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-219-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 303/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-303-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-303-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 VE 4/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ve-4-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ve-4-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 366/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-366-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-366-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 595/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-595-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-595-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 31/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-31-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-31-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 20/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-20-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-20-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87976 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 38/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-38-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-38-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87975 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 9/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-9-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-9-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 8/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-8-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-8-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 4/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-4-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-4-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 6/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-6-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-6-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 550/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-550-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-550-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 92/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-92-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-92-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 100/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-100-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-100-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 117/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-117-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:54:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:54:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-117-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 BA 59/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ba-59-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ba-59-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bf062b530f82c75c3256cdea26a6160a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:95b29e50ebe930a23e1338bde114db18:0.67944500 1747388872 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.