| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 938/19 | 25.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 250/20 | 08.07.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 16. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 19 AL 263/20 | 04.08.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 130/21 | 09.08.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 1587/18 WA | 12.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 126/19 | 25.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 14/23 B | 20.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 123 AS 1561/19 | 17.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1079/22 B | 05.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 33 KR 248/17 | 28.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 435/19 | 29.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 7/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 2543/19 | 24.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 421/20 | 26.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 68/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 26 U 4340/17 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1894/21 | 24.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 SB 2546/20 | 11.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 385/23 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 18 AS 1459/16 | 27.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 53/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 18 AS 153/17 | 17.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 114/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 18 AS 2111/18 | 19.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 105/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 36 U 110/19 | 26.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 U 78/21 | 27.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 51 R 300/11 | 13.08.2014 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 193/18 | 24.01.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 83 R 204/20 | 16.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 122/21 | 28.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 2 R 98/17 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9/12 R 207/18 | 03.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| L 7 AS 97/22 | 21.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 AS 77/23 | 14.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | |||
| L 7 AS 96/22 | 21.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 AS 76/23 | 14.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 46 SO 177/21 ER | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 42/22 B ER | 13.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 50 BA 11/19 | 02.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 17/22 | 08.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 11 R 431/16 | 01.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 91/18 | 06.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 2 SB 203/19 | 04.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SB 120/21 | 16.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 28 AS 752/16 | 17.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 162/22 | 04.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 17 R 80/17 | 30.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 9/23 | 08.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 223 KR 2413/21 | 26.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 10. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 412/18 | 14.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 141/19 | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 11/22 B | 07.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. August 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 113 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 113 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 113 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 250/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-250-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-250-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 130/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-130-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-130-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 126/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-126-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-126-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1079/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1079-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1079-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129129 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 435/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-435-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-435-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 421/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-421-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-421-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1894/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1894-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1894-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 385/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-385-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-385-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 53/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-53-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-53-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 114/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-114-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-114-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138998 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 105/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-105-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-105-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 78/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-78-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-78-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 193/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-193-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-193-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 122/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-122-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-122-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9/12 R 207/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-12-r-207-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-12-r-207-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 77/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-77-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-77-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 76/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-76-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-76-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 42/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-42-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-42-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 17/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-17-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-17-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 91/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-91-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-91-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 120/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-120-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-120-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 162/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-162-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-162-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 9/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-9-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-9-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 223 KR 2413/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-223-kr-2413-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-223-kr-2413-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139371 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 412/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-412-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-412-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 250/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-250-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-250-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d4d6edc3064529edccefe54acf3311f3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:81abbe5aa27d5b6a686110039eba4130:0.19146200 1747414627 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.