| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 412/18 | 14.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 141/19 | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 11/22 B | 07.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 412/18 | 14.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 141/19 | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 11/22 B | 07.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 498/18 | 27.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 2297/21 | 18.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 KG 2250/21 | 04.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 KG 494/22 | 26.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 26 R 5812/19 | 06.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1595/22 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 U 48/18 | 26.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2078/21 | 18.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 KR 1013/21 | 24.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 62/23 B | 17.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 AS 25/21 | 14.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 3369/21 | 11.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 AL 129/21 | 09.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2213/21 | 28.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 AS 2266/21 | 04.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 493/23 | 19.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 18 AS 1781/17 | 20.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 1/16 | 18.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 4/17 | 11.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 3/21 R | 30.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 12 U 82/16 | 21.03.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 92/23 B | 03.08.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 1771/22 | 06.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 89/23 B | 19.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 R 3376/19 | 18.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 3208/22 | 10.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 32 R 3344/17 | 21.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 8 KR 45/18 | 07.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 54/21 | 23.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 25/23 B | 19.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 7. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 8 KR 45/18 | 07.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 54/21 | 23.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 25/23 B | 19.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 7. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 34 KR 1684/22 | 21.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 7. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 28 SO 5/16 | 17.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 92/19 | 19.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 13/22 B | 03.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 7. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 28 SO 5/16 | 17.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 92/19 | 19.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 13/22 B | 03.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 7. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 R 1471/21 | 19.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2899/21 | 18.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 1 U 7008/18 | 18.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2090/20 | 18.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SO 137/23 ER | 01.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 486/23 ER-B | 08.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 11 U 74/20 | 15.06.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 4. August 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 114 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 114 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 114 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 412/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-412-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-412-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 141/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-141-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-141-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 2297/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-2297-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-2297-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KG 494/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kg-494-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kg-494-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1595/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1595-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1595-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159455 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2078/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2078-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2078-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159452 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 62/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-62-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-62-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 3369/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-3369-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-3369-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2213/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2213-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2213-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 493/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-493-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:08:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:08:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-493-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144975 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 AS 1781/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-as-1781-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-as-1781-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 92/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-92-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-92-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 89/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-89-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-89-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 3208/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-3208-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-3208-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 R 3344/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-r-3344-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-r-3344-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 45/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-45-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-45-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139353 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 54/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-54-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-54-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 KR 1684/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-kr-1684-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-kr-1684-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 SO 5/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-so-5-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-so-5-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136951 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 92/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-92-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-92-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2899/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2899-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2899-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2090/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2090-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2090-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 486/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-486-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-486-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140351 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 U 74/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-u-74-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-u-74-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 412/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-412-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-412-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0a746081fd0bfdf0fc587866667d7e31 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bd50c3e809ac3cc2fa4e07a843284625:0.14283400 1747432449 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.