| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 U 267/18 | 09.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 450/22 B | 02.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 16 R 815/18 | 27.09.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 521/19 | 14.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 199/22 B | 31.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 3. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 150/23 ER | 19.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 3. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 1663/23 ER | 13.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 3. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 U 2127/18 | 20.07.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 3. August 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 453/18 | 13.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 114/22 | 31.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 41 SB 580/14 | 10.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SB 103/19 | 25.01.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 19 AY 64/22 ER | 02.12.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 2/23 B ER | 20.02.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 KR 963/16 | 12.06.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 310/18 | 30.11.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 U 2053/20 | 10.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 974/22 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 25 SB 692/21 | 03.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 436/22 | 23.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 SB 151/19 | 07.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 353/22 | 23.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 1394/21 | 16.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 3560/22 | 13.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 395/18 | 13.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 448/20 | 20.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 91/22 B | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 2. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 395/18 | 13.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 448/20 | 20.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 91/22 B | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 2. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 5 KR 1294/18 | 19.04.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 434/21 | 30.03.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 1398/17 | 05.09.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 129/20 | 11.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 104/19 | 31.03.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 381/21 | 11.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 827/19 | 21.07.2022 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 125/23 | 06.06.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 26 AL 150/19 | 07.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 115/20 | 08.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 39/21 R | 15.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2023 |
| - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 3/19 EK AL | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 2/21 R | 09.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 9/17 | 28.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 194/18 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 1/21 R | 30.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 1 KR 101/21 | 23.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 212/21 | 07.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 10/22 R | 11.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 26 BA 587/19 | 14.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 2807/22 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KA 6989/14 | 22.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 856/20 | 17.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 115 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 115 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 115 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 450/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-450-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-450-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 R 815/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-r-815-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-r-815-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 150/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-150-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-150-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133306 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 1663/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-1663-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-1663-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 2127/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-2127-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-2127-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 114/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-114-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-114-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 103/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-103-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-103-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 2/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-2-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-2-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 310/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-310-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-310-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 974/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-974-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-974-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 436/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-436-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-436-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 353/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-353-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-353-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 3560/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-3560-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-3560-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 395/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-395-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-395-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 448/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-448-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-448-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 434/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-434-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-434-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 129/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-129-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-129-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 381/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-381-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-381-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 125/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-125-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-125-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 39/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-39-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-39-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 ÜG 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-ueg-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-ueg-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 10/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-10-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-10-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 2807/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-2807-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-2807-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 856/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-856-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-856-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 450/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-450-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-450-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8139513b3aef2302c39b3d323fae1aa8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3119e5230a232c7cd73abcddc3950b37:0.78213200 1747446316 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.