| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 AL 1022/22 | 14.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 1022/22 | 19.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 BA 2472/20 | 11.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 373/22 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 591/16 | 14.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 31. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 KR 3141/19 | 25.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 281/21 KH | 18.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 31. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 22 SO 289/22 ER | 28.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 338/22 B ER | 01.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 31. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 SO 262/18 | 28.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 427/21 | 15.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 6/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 31. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5022/23 | 20.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 31. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 3247/22 | 14.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 31. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 4 BA 9/18 | 03.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 17/22 | 27.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 8/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 31. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 4 BA 9/18 | 03.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 17/22 | 27.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 8/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 31. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 6 AS 160/22 | 08.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 AS 39/23 B | 20.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 28. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 2/23 ER | 08.03.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 41/23 B ER | 01.06.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 27. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 17/21 ER | 01.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 27. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 9/15 | 20.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 205/19 | 02.06.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 27. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 9/15 | 20.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 205/19 | 02.06.2023 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 26 R 561/20 zuvor S 35 R 561/20 | 20.04.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 233/23 ZV | 17.07.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 U 5017/19 | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 3426/20 | 20.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 15 AS 1259/22 | 04.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2274/22 | 20.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 19 AS 1953/20 | 04.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 3069/21 | 20.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 U 3600/16 und S 8 U 3470/16 | 14.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1630/18 | 16.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 U 2605/18 | 29.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2906/21 | 16.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 AS 676/20 | 11.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 196/21 | 18.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 R 1959/21 | 24.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 991/22 | 18.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 R 237/21 | 15.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3005/22 | 18.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 AS 233/23 ER | 23.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 716/23 ER-B | 27.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 116 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 116 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 116 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 1022/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-1022-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-1022-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 373/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-373-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-373-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 591/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-591-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-591-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 281/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-281-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-281-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 338/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-338-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-338-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 427/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-427-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-427-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5022/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5022-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5022-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 3247/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-3247-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-3247-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134966 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 BA 9/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-ba-9-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-ba-9-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 17/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-17-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-17-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137543 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Entschließungs- und Auswahlermessen bei Verhängung von Ordnungsgeld gegen Verfahrensbeteiligte – Eigene Ermessensentscheidung des Beschwerdegerichts [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => entschliessungs-und-auswahlermessen-bei-verhaengung-von-ordnungsgeld-gegen-verfahrensbeteiligte-eigene-ermessensentscheidung-des-beschwerdegerichts [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/entschliessungs-und-auswahlermessen-bei-verhaengung-von-ordnungsgeld-gegen-verfahrensbeteiligte-eigene-ermessensentscheidung-des-beschwerdegerichts/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 2/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-2-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-2-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 17/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-17-21-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-17-21-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 9/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-9-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-9-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 205/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-205-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-205-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 233/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-233-23-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-233-23-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 3426/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-3426-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-3426-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2274/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2274-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2274-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 3069/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-3069-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-3069-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1630/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1630-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1630-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2906/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2906-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2906-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 196/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-196-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-196-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 991/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-991-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-991-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3005/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3005-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3005-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 716/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-716-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-716-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 1022/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-1022-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-1022-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 491b63033262302d74231baa1658827b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0aac45840907b944c3607d73c50ce9e9:0.11607700 1748435241 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.