| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 3228/20 | 07.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 125/23 | 26.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 172/21 ER | 01.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 26. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 SO 1854/20 | 16.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2864/21 | 14.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 1179/20 | 25.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2802/22 | 14.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 1990/21 | 30.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1789/22 | 14.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 SO 1378/21 | 28.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2552/22 | 14.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 3392/21 | 27.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1213/23 | 14.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 SO 2621/21 | 14.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 142/23 | 14.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 SO 2621/21 | 14.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 142/23 | 14.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 1611/19 | 19.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 469/20 | 24.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 160/21 | 03.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 25. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 2/23 ER | 08.03.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 41/23 B ER | 01.06.2023 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 2/23 ER | 08.03.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 41/23 B ER | 01.06.2023 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Juli 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 428/22 KL ER | 20.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 SF 38/23 | 13.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 923/22 | 06.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 12 U 303/18 | 13.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 78/21 | 22.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 24. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 20 SO 195/20 | 12.05.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 SO 296/22 | 12.06.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 24. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 14 R 559/22 | 07.09.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 485/22 B PKH | 05.06.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 9 AY 105/21 | 23.09.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 136/22 | 31.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 2 KR 116/23 ER | 27.04.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 277/23 B ER | 19.07.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 627/18 | 28.04.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 195/20 | 30.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 2 P 144/21 | 11.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 7/22 | 19.08.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 1570/22 | 04.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 108/21 | 05.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Juli 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 117 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 117 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 117 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 125/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-125-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-125-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 17/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-17-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-17-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2864/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2864-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2864-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159347 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2802/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2802-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2802-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159343 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1789/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1789-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1789-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2552/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2552-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2552-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159335 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1213/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1213-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1213-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 142/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-142-23-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-142-23-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 142/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-142-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-142-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 469/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-469-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-469-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 160/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-160-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-160-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 41/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-41-23-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-41-23-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 41/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-41-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-41-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 428/22 KL ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-428-22-kl-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-428-22-kl-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129117 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 SF 38/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-sf-38-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-sf-38-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143834 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 923/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-923-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-923-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Meniskusschäden bei Profifußballer anerkannt [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => meniskusschaeden-bei-profifussballer-anerkannt [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/meniskusschaeden-bei-profifussballer-anerkannt/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 195/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-195-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-195-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 485/22 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-485-22-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-485-22-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 136/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-136-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-136-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 277/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-277-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-277-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 195/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-195-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-195-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130813 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 7/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-7-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-7-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 1570/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-1570-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-1570-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 108/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-108-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-108-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 125/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-125-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-125-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 25c37f8424963cf04139ab07afef6350 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4a37df47039e0d951e0856d5be94476d:0.27744200 1747469496 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.