| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 26 KR 14/18 | 18.09.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 21/21 | 25.04.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 34 BA 41/18 | 15.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 20. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 AS 410/19 | 22.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 600/20 | 26.04.2023 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 32 R 81/16 | 02.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 61/21 | 13.06.2023 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 32 R 81/16 | 02.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 61/21 | 13.06.2023 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 10 AL 419/18 | 19.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 84/20 | 20.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 42/21 R | 15.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 1 AL 181/16 | 25.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 AL 33/18 | 22.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 37/21 R | 15.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 U 3445/21 | 07.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 619/22 | 18.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 U 333/20 | 18.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1956/21 | 14.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 U 2091/20 | 22.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 911/22 | 14.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 R 2124/14 | 12.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 138/18 | 14.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 3 AS 1237/21 | 04.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 3160/21 | 28.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 19 P 4077/20 | 27.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 1640/21 | 26.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 KR 659/23 ER | 09.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 849/23 ER-B | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 11 U 40/15 | 08.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 U 233/18 | 17.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 18. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 12 AS 315/22 | 04.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 AS 148/22 B | 09.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 18. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 8 EG 1/19 | 26.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 EG 4/20 | 24.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 1/22 R | 09.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 SB 2624/17 | 21.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3843/19 | 18.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 8/21 R | 09.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 32 SB 333/18 | 25.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SB 99/19 | 29.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 1/22 R | 09.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2023 |
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 707/19 KL | 28.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 69/21 R | 25.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 31 AS 1129/18 | 28.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 39/20 | 05.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 9/22 R | 08.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 R 365/21 | 07.06.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 R 313/22 | 09.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 217/22 B | 15.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 3 U 73/09 | 28.04.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 172/15 | 14.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 2/21 R | 30.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 1573/21 | 04.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 17. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 R 489/22 | 08.09.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 459/22 | 09.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 22/23 AR | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 17. Juli 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 118 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 118 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 118 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 21/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-21-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-21-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 BA 41/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-ba-41-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-ba-41-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130570 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 600/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-600-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-600-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 61/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-61-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-61-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130567 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 61/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-61-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-61-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87966 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 42/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-42-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-42-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 37/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-37-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-37-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 619/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-619-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-619-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1956/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1956-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1956-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 911/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-911-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-911-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 138/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-138-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-138-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 3160/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-3160-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-3160-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 1640/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-1640-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-1640-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 849/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-849-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-849-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Chronische Erschöpfung infolge einer Lebendnierenspende [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => chronische-erschoepfung-infolge-einer-lebendnierenspende [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/chronische-erschoepfung-infolge-einer-lebendnierenspende/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Prozesskostenhilfe bei Erledigung in der Sache vor Entscheidungsreife [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => prozesskostenhilfe-bei-erledigung-in-der-sache-vor-entscheidungsreife [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/prozesskostenhilfe-bei-erledigung-in-der-sache-vor-entscheidungsreife/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 1/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-1-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-1-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 8/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-8-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-8-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 1/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-1-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-1-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 69/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-69-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-69-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 9/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-9-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-9-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87959 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 217/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-217-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-217-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 210 KR 1573/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-210-kr-1573-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-210-kr-1573-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140349 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 R 489/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-r-489-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-r-489-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 21/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-21-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-21-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d1fbd2c171da335b6052d82361374cf6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bfa501e318a24d7fffe126ff2f6df8c4:0.30251100 1747605288 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.