| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 74 SV 151/23 | 03.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 SV 12/24 B | 06.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 74 SV 151/23 | 03.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 SV 12/24 B | 06.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 158/19 | 29.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 28/20 | 18.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 R 3558/16 | 25.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 1881/21 | 25.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 11 AS 202/21 | 14.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 295/24 | 26.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 213/23 | 24.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2612/23 | 20.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 AS 1303/24 | 24.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1671/24 | 23.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 AS 1162/24 | 23.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1638/24 | 23.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 10 R 2221/21 | 28.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1009/23 | 23.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 223 KR 1872/20 | 13.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 22/24 | 16.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 460/20 | 02.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 17/22 | 18.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 3/23 R | 05.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. November 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 6 KA 45/18 | 29.11.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 7/22 | 27.08.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 142 AS 3881/24 ER | 04.09.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 853/24 B ER | 09.10.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 R 575/22 | 03.08.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 443/23 | 03.05.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 32/24 BH | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 7. November 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 SO 77/18 | 04.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 62/20 | 14.08.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 SO 77/18 | 04.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 62/20 | 14.08.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 23 U 367/20 | 26.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 86/22 | 18.09.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 74 SV 74/24 | 23.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 SV 18/24 B | 23.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. November 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 38 SF 102/24 EK R PKH WA | 29.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 4/24 ER | 22.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 28/24 B ER | 14.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 32 KR 46/20 | 27.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 101/22 | 16.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 105/21 | 23.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 7/22 | 18.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 1295/20 | 09.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 15/23 | 18.09.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 17/24 BH | 25.11.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. November 2024 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 25/24 RG | 06.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 21 AS 692/24 ER | 16.07.2024 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 326/24 B ER | 28.10.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. November 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 12 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 12 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 12 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SV 12/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sv-12-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sv-12-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SV 12/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sv-12-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sv-12-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 28/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-28-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-28-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 1881/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-1881-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:33:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:33:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-1881-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 295/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-295-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-295-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2612/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2612-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2612-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1671/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1671-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1671-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1638/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1638-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1638-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1009/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1009-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1009-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 22/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-22-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-22-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 3/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-3-23-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-3-23-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 7/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-7-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-7-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 142 AS 3881/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-142-as-3881-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-142-as-3881-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 575/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-575-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:19:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:19:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-575-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SO 77/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-so-77-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-so-77-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 62/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-62-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-62-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 86/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-86-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-86-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SV 18/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sv-18-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sv-18-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 38 SF 102/24 EK R PKH WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-38-sf-102-24-ek-r-pkh-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-38-sf-102-24-ek-r-pkh-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 28/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-28-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-28-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 101/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-101-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-101-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 7/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-7-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-7-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 15/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-15-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-15-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129744 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 25/24 RG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-25-24-rg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-25-24-rg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 326/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-326-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-326-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SV 12/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sv-12-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sv-12-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f6624737b402a68124971f5801b6f398 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.