| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 3 EG 12/19 | 03.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 EG 8/20 | 25.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 4/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 51 KR 1818/17 | 23.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 BA 24/20 | 23.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 9/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 22 AS 2577/18 | 25.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 477/21 | 21.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 203 AS 5825/20 | 09.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 142/23 B PKH | 05.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AS 12925/16 | 18.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 2002/19 | 01.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 4 R 489/16 | 29.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 411/18 | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 2/22 R | 08.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 22 SO 289/22 ER | 28.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 338/22 B ER | 01.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Juli 2023 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1754/22 ER | 06.02.2023 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 20 AS 2725/22 ER | 10.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1671/22 B ER, L 7 AS 1672/22 B | 31.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 174 AS 498/23 | 18.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 526/23 B PKH | 21.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Juli 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 26/21 KL | 26.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 5/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 52 SO 455/15 | 07.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 34/20 | 23.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 2/22 R | 23.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 43 SO 298/20 | 06.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 429/21 | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 70 AS 836/19 | 06.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 246/22 | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 70 AS 308/19 | 06.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 223/22 | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 14 BA 10/21 | 11.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 26/22 | 08.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 10. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 14 R 916/17 | 11.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 BA 103/19 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 10. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 17 AL 85/23 | 02.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 SF 5/23 S | 14.06.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 10. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 10 AS 1435/17 | 12.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 697/20 | 18.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 68/23 BH | 22.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 10. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 27 BK 18/19 | 23.07.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 10. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 BA 654/18 | 10.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 2549/19 | 18.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 3/21 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 KR 295/17 | 10.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 715/17 | 25.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 3/21 R | 13.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 AL 145/19 | 08.04.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 57/20 | 08.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 40/21 R | 15.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 24 AS 22/21 | 10.01.2022 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 7/22 R | 08.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 KA 150/22 | 19.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 1/23 B | 26.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 SF 1/23 R | 19.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 120 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 120 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 120 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 EG 8/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-eg-8-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-eg-8-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 24/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-24-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-24-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 477/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-477-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-477-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 142/23 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-142-23-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-142-23-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 2002/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-2002-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-2002-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 2/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-2-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-2-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 338/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-338-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-338-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1754/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1754-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1754-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1671/22 B ER, L 7 AS 1672/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1671-22-b-er-l-7-as-1672-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1671-22-b-er-l-7-as-1672-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 526/23 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-526-23-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-526-23-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 26/21 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-26-21-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-26-21-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 2/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-2-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-2-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149133 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 429/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-429-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-429-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 246/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-246-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-246-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 223/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-223-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-223-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 26/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-26-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-26-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 103/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-103-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-103-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 AL 85/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-al-85-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-al-85-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AS 1435/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-as-1435-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-as-1435-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 BK 18/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-bk-18-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-bk-18-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 3/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-3-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-3-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 3/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-3-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-3-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87952 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 40/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-40-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-40-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87951 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 7/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-7-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-7-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87950 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 SF 1/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-sf-1-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-sf-1-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 EG 8/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-eg-8-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-eg-8-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c22c21eba6fba28a5e4836fde7dca551 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e4bd4a702189399ff016e8b17caac435:0.75546900 1747508620 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.