| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 20 AL 6/16 | 05.11.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 7. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 3 KR 355/17 | 09.10.2019 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 7. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 366/22 | 30.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 6. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 19 SO 132/21 | 14.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 35/22 | 20.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 SO 97/22 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 SO 334/22 B PKH | 24.01.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 27 AS 1718/22 ER | 09.05.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 339/23 B ER | 26.06.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 6 AS 1132/21 | 02.06.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 298/22 | 03.07.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 KR 1383/17 | 15.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 659/22 | 27.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 KR 2564/20 | 05.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2409/22 | 27.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 19 KR 6719/17 | 08.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2637/20 | 27.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 23 R 1/16 | 14.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 332/20 | 13.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 181/22 B | 18.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. Juli 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 32 SB 88/19 | 19.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 88/23 B | 30.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 40 AS 3025/14 | 20.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 1004/18 | 09.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 2 U 12/16 | 09.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 113/19 | 20.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 5/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 107/22 KL | 08.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 107/22 KL | 08.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 475/21 KL | 08.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 49/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 47/19 | 06.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 375/21 | 31.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 197 AS 1455/23 ER | 11.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 512/23 B ER | 19.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 63/20 | 03.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 9/23 B | 08.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 18 AY 58/22 | 20.01.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 7/23 | 31.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 R 621/22 | 20.12.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 39/23 NZB | 05.06.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 20 SO 47/20 | 11.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 229/21 | 13.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 213 AS 1028/23 ER | 27.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 320/23 B ER | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 79/17 | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 231/19 | 27.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 62/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Juli 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 122 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 122 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 122 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AL 6/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-al-6-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-al-6-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 355/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-355-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-355-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 R 366/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-r-366-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-r-366-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 35/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-35-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-35-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 334/22 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-334-22-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-334-22-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 339/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-339-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-339-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 298/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-298-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-298-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 659/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-659-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-659-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159216 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2409/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2409-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2409-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2637/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2637-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2637-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 R 1/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-r-1-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-r-1-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 88/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-88-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-88-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129090 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 1004/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-1004-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-1004-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 113/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-113-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-113-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 107/22 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-107-22-kl-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-107-22-kl-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 107/22 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-107-22-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-107-22-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129080 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 475/21 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-475-21-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-475-21-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129077 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 375/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-375-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-375-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 512/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-512-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-512-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 9/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-9-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-9-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 7/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-7-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-7-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 39/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-39-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-39-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 229/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-229-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-229-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 320/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-320-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-320-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 231/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-231-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-231-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AL 6/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-al-6-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-al-6-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d28cf2060f478b2c03b47135be419525 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4e130f9baa267a17b6ebf11320509485:0.71818800 1747532525 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.