| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 169/21 | 31.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 3. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 AS 772/22 | 23.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 362/23 B | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 3. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 16 KR 30/20 | 28.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 432/22 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 P 175/19 | 22.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 3. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 R 164/23 | 05.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 3. Juli 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 107 AS 4057/22 ER | 16.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 248/23 B ER PKH | 23.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 78 AS 774/23 ER | 16.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 280/23 B ER | 24.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 10 U 93/17 | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 176/20 | 03.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Juli 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 981/21 | 03.11.2021 | L 10 U 3737/21 | 04.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | |||
| S 4 R 5638/19 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3518/22 WA | 04.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 3 AS 2926/20 | 31.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 1526/21 | 28.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 R 76/20 | 03.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1852/21 | 28.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 P 2061/22 ER | 30.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 668/23 ER-B | 30.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 U 477/20 | 25.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1216/21 | 16.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 KR 372/21 WA | 28.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2463/21 | 09.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 KR 10/20 | 22.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3599/20 | 09.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 R 2147/18 | 25.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 20/21 | 03.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 KR 408/19 | 04.01.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 15/21 | 25.04.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 125/22 | 22.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 29. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5130/21 | 28.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 29. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 KR 387/22 | 20.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 29. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 2 R 165/19 | 21.07.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 214/22 | 28.03.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 29. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 2646/20 | 29.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 3936/21 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2023 | ||
| S 16 BA 651/20 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 BA 2308/22 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 R 1265/19 | 21.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 1401/21 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 123 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 123 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 123 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 169/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-169-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-169-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 772/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-772-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-772-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 432/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-432-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-432-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 P 175/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-p-175-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-p-175-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 164/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-164-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-164-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 248/23 B ER PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-248-23-b-er-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-248-23-b-er-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 280/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-280-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-280-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 176/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-176-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-176-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3737/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3737-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3737-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3518/22 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3518-22-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3518-22-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 1526/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-1526-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-1526-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1852/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1852-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1852-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 668/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-668-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-668-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1216/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1216-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1216-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2463/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2463-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2463-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3599/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3599-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3599-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 20/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-20-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-20-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 15/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-15-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-15-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143821 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 125/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-125-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-125-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5130/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5130-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5130-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140347 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 387/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-387-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-387-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 165/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-165-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-165-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 3936/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-3936-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-3936-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 2308/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-2308-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-2308-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 1401/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-1401-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-1401-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 169/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-169-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-169-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a9796da900a78a3c95b971f7ea9e8161 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:7df8c0f07ed8ab4a8fe92d2b9371db19:0.56620100 1747525986 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.