| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 R 475/21 | 03.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 3658/21 | 15.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 3 P 1401/20 | 22.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 3325/21 | 15.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 P 4569/19 | 05.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 1800/21 | 15.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 3 AS 3335/20 | 09.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 143/21 | 15.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 SO 85/23 ER | 20.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 28. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 AS 718/21 | 22.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 28. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 2 R 165/19 | 21.07.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 214/22 | 28.03.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 28. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 78/21 | 29.10.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 202/21 | 07.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 28. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 49 AS 1843/16 | 07.07.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 822/21 | 18.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 67/23 B | 15.12.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 49 AS 415/16 | 07.07.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 821/21 | 18.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 66/23 B | 15.12.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 36 KR 2057/15 | 01.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 121/19 | 05.06.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 40 AS 4037/18 | 27.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 955/19 NZB | 25.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 145/19 ZV zuvor S 33 R 145/19 ZV | 01.11.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 522/22 ZV | 19.06.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 6 SF 140/22 E | 26.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1476/22 B | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 SF 149/22 E | 19.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1486/22 B | 09.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 11 AS 135/23 ER | 13.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 417/23 B ER | 03.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 U 2168/22 | 13.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 27. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 R 80/18 | 09.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 122/20 | 21.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 10/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 27. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 115/17 | 28.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 67/20 | 30.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 1729/20 | 15.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L ^1 KR 317/21 | 22.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 2402/13 | 07.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 106/19 | 22.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2023 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 10 SF 3/23 EK | - | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 12 R 310/19 | 05.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 316/21 | 13.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 19 AS 1839/19 | 04.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 519/22 | 15.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 23 U 58/15 | 07.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 70/19 | 02.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 124 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 124 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 124 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 3658/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-3658-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-3658-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 3325/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-3325-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-3325-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 1800/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-1800-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-1800-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 143/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-143-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-143-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 85/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-85-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-85-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 718/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-718-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-718-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 214/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-214-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-214-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 78/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-78-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-78-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 822/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-822-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-822-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 821/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-821-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-821-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 121/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-121-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-121-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161362 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 955/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-955-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-955-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 522/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-522-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-522-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1476/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1476-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1476-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1486/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1486-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1486-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 417/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-417-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-417-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 U 2168/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-u-2168-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-u-2168-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 80/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-80-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-80-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 67/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-67-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-67-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 317/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-317-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-317-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129039 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 106/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-106-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-106-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 3/23 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-3-23-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-3-23-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 316/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-316-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-316-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 519/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-519-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-519-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 70/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-70-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-70-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 3658/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-3658-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-3658-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9f9f0013a803ac390d183cc948857685 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:442f115ee7659a3089a17ef0fe1df2de:0.34566600 1747649269 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.