| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 6 R 512/16 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 209/22 WA | 02.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 27 AS 2268/15 | 08.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 587/22 | 14.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 29 AS 1111/16 | 19.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 635/22 B | 27.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 32 AS 2315/20 | 14.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 268/22 | 27.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 1322/21 WA | 08.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 95/22 | 31.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 973/16 | 15.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 6/19 | 26.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 1217/11 | 02.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 BA 35/18 | 08.12.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 15 KR 6006/19 | 10.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 872/21 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 34 KR 2652/22 ER | 27.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 118/23 B ER | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 13 KG 1/21 | 15.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 KG 3/22 | 26.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 KG 2/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 KG 7/19 | 26.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 KG 1/21 | 26.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 KG 1/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 26 AS 370/17 | 30.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 41/22 | 24.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 42/23 AR | 26.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 26. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 26 AS 370/17 | 30.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 41/22 | 24.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 42/23 AR | 26.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 26. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 1047/17 | 05.08.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 351/20 | 25.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 36/22 B | 23.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 26. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 1047/17 | 05.08.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 351/20 | 25.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 36/22 B | 23.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 26. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 23 KR 7059/18 | 03.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4109/20 | 23.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 BA 1532/20 | 09.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 3282/21 | 23.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 23 R 2176/22 | 05.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 103/23 | 23.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 7 SB 2205/18 | 12.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1157/21 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 VM 4807/19 | 20.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VM 3577/21 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 VS 831/19 | 08.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VS 3505/22 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 513/20 | 31.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 23. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 12 VE 5/13 | 11.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 4/21 | 16.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 4/23 BH | 22.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 23. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 173 AS 5038/19 | 01.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 35/21 | 16.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 32 KR 264/19 | 28.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 211/21 | 16.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 125 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 125 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 125 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 209/22 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-209-22-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-209-22-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 587/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-587-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-587-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 635/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-635-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-635-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 268/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-268-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-268-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 95/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-95-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-95-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 6/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-6-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-6-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 35/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-35-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-35-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 872/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-872-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-872-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 118/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-118-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-118-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 KG 3/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-kg-3-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-kg-3-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 KG 1/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-kg-1-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-kg-1-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137190 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 370/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-370-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-370-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 41/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-41-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-41-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 1047/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-1047-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-1047-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 351/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-351-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-351-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 4109/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-4109-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-4109-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 3282/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-3282-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-3282-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 103/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-103-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-103-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1157/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1157-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1157-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VM 3577/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vm-3577-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vm-3577-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VS 3505/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vs-3505-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vs-3505-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 513/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-513-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-513-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 VE 5/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ve-5-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ve-5-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 35/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-35-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-35-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 211/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-211-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-211-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 209/22 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-209-22-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-209-22-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8e191bbe6a7a5f83ad6ca07ef83668ce [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:16f111372a6680e65776a26e90fe18fd:0.16973600 1747543003 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.