| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 1557/20 | 05.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 461/21 | 08.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 8 AS 900/23 ER | 13.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 288/23 B ER | 17.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 4 AS 1986/17 | 02.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 72/23 WA | 17.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 17/18 | 13.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 16/19 | 29.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 1 SF 64/20 E | 07.03.2023 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 66/23 B E | 02.06.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 5 KR 1/23 ER | 09.02.2023 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 14/23 B ER | 06.06.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 46 AS 4647/17 | 27.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 952/21 | 31.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 122/22 B | 04.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 32 AS 305/21 | 14.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 360/22 | 09.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 2/23 AR | 17.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 1930/20 | 22.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 193/22 | 07.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 AS 246/21 | 03.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 445/22 | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 166/22 AR | 10.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 R 1071/15 | 17.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 359/18 | 09.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 173/22 B | 12.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 R 1071/15 | 17.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 359/18 | 09.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 173/22 B | 12.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 AS 350/21 | 06.10.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 22. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 R 80/18 | 09.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 122/20 | 21.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 10/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 22. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 42 AS 876/19 | 20.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 22. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 223 KR 691/17 | 06.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 BA 31/20 | 22.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 2408/15 | 16.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 62/19 | 29.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juni 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 SF 118/23 ERI | 16.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 48 SO 131/23 ER | 15.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 36 U 38/22 | 13.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 21. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 62/17 | 18.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 675/19 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 21. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 527/20 | 03.05.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 20/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 20. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 10 R 1050/18 | 11.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 734/20 | 13.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 43/23 B | 12.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 303/14 | 08.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 9/19 | 17.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 35/22 B | 01.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 87 AS 571/23 ER | 19.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Dortmund | L 7 AS 586/23 B ER, L 7 AS 571/23 B | 07.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juni 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 126 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 126 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 126 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 461/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-461-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-461-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 288/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-288-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-288-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 72/23 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-72-23-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-72-23-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 16/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-16-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-16-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SG 66/23 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sg-66-23-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sg-66-23-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 14/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-14-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-14-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 952/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-952-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-952-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 360/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-360-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-360-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 193/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-193-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-193-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 445/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-445-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-445-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 359/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-359-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:37:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:37:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-359-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 359/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-359-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:37:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:37:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-359-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140117 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 350/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-350-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-350-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 122/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-122-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-122-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 AS 876/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-as-876-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-as-876-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 31/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-31-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-31-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 62/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-62-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-62-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 118/23 ERI [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-118-23-eri [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-118-23-eri/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 SO 131/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-so-131-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-so-131-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143476 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 U 38/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-u-38-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-u-38-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 62/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-62-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-62-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 527/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-527-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-527-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 734/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-734-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-734-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 9/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-9-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:37:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:37:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-9-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 586/23 B ER, L 7 AS 571/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-586-23-b-er-l-7-as-571-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:37:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:37:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-586-23-b-er-l-7-as-571-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 461/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-461-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-461-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 75e0c47caf89fead1a4c4092ecc1886f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:91937eb10807b19db52f13c7e71edade:0.83030500 1747567990 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.