| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 14/20 | 12.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 173/21 | 15.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 24/23 B | 05.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 14/20 | 12.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 173/21 | 15.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 24/23 B | 05.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 3934/17 | 29.05.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 561/20 | 20.04.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 8. Juni 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 368/20 KL | 12.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 6/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Juni 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 127/20 EK AS | 27.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | L 9 KG 494/22 | 04.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 KG 494/22 | 26.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 AS 2049/21 | 28.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 1463/22 | 22.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AS 1985/17 | 16.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 475/23 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AS 335/18 | 04.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 476/23 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 KA 4802/17 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 2311/19 | 30.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 AS 631/23 ER | 15.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 880/23 ER-B | 02.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 63 KR 6466/19 | 23.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 377/21 KH | 22.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 73/22 B | 11.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 49 KR 1843/21 | 19.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 404/22 | 25.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 2/23 AR | 08.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 17 KR 691/19 | 19.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 440/21 | 24.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 23/22 BH | 13.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5120/21 | 17.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 7. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 19 KR 830/16 | 26.01.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 42/18 | 24.05.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 686/16 | 29.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 6/20 | 22.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 8/23 R | 28.08.2024 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 133/22 | 31.05.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 18/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 P 39/15 | 23.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 60/19 | 24.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 19 AS 829/22 ER | 16.12.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 26/23 B ER | 24.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 6. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stralsund | S 5 SO 21/16 | 10.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 9 SO 44/17 | 28.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 4/21 R | 08.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 287/18 | 16.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 39/20 | 19.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 6/22 R | 23.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Juni 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 64/19 | 28.07.2021 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 4/22 R | 23.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 3/20 | 26.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 205/20 | 17.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 5. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 3/20 | 26.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 205/20 | 17.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 5. Juni 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 129 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 129 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 129 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3200, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137133 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 173/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-173-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-173-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 561/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-561-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-561-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 368/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-368-20-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-368-20-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 127/20 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-127-20-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-127-20-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KG 494/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kg-494-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kg-494-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 1463/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-1463-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-1463-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 475/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-475-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-475-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 476/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-476-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-476-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 2311/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-2311-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-2311-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 880/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-880-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-880-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 377/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-377-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-377-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148952 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 404/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-404-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-404-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 440/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-440-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-440-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5120/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5120-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5120-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150492 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 42/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-42-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-42-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 6/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-6-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-6-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 133/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-133-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-133-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 60/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-60-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-60-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 26/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-26-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-26-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 6/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-6-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-6-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 4/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-4-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-4-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 3/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-3-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-3-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 205/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-205-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-205-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137133 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2eb52c8c2e5f8a2b83a3b1944ce632f6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6a90bbbdb4fc6118f0c92427f6b4d750:0.71651200 1747583878 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.