| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 26 R 344/19 | 28.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 1873/22 | 28.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 AS 778/22 | 14.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 2861/22 | 22.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 U 2719/19 | 10.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3956/20 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 776/18 | 11.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1842/21 | 06.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 AS 693/22 | 13.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 3086/22 | 22.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 AS 42/22 | 02.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 1520/22 | 22.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 18 AS 5338/18 | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 2590/20 | 22.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 BL 3541/19 | 08.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 BL 2488/20 | 27.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 U 3712/19 | 14.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 3677/21 | 27.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 18 P 153/20 | 10.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 132/22 | 15.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 R 799/19 | 11.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 3023/20 | 15.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 AS 113/23 ER | 13.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 2. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 AS 783/21 | 17.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 2. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 158/22 | 22.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 2. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | 34 AS 1671/19 | 09.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 48/23 B | 27.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 17 U 78/20 | 10.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 297/20 | 19.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 49 AS 354/22 ER | 08.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 AS 90/23 B ER | 21.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 6 BA 51/19 | 05.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 39/22 | 17.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 64 BA 2/18 | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 38/22 | 17.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 28 R 609/16 | 30.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 38/21 | 17.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 4 BA 32/19 | 29.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 2. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 642/22 | 03.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. Juni 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 VJ 1/08 | 06.02.2013 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VJ 4/13 | 14.12.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juni 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 27/22 | 23.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 31. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 AL 1978/22 | 17.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 31. Mai 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 130 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 130 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 130 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1873/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1873-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1873-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159053 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 2861/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-2861-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-2861-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159049 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3956/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3956-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3956-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159045 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1842/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1842-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1842-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 3086/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-3086-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-3086-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 1520/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-1520-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-1520-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159034 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2590/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2590-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2590-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BL 2488/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-bl-2488-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-bl-2488-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 3677/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-3677-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-3677-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 132/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-132-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-132-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 3023/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-3023-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-3023-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 113/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-113-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-113-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 783/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-783-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-783-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 U 158/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-u-158-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-u-158-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 48/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-48-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-48-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 297/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-297-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-297-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 90/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-90-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-90-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 39/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-39-22-3 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-39-22-3/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 38/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-38-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-38-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 38/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-38-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-38-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 BA 32/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-ba-32-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-ba-32-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149893 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 642/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-642-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-642-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VJ 4/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vj-4-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vj-4-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 27/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-27-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-27-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 1978/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-1978-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-1978-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1873/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1873-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1873-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9af187b2aed37640ef5e99c6aa35d749 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3e95618f29bb2773d3dab22898c1755a:0.97522700 1747594487 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.