| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 SB 311/19 | 26.04.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 51/22 | 02.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 4/23 AR | 25.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 31. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 SB 311/19 | 26.04.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 51/22 | 02.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 4/23 AR | 25.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 31. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5007/21 | 16.11.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 5011/21 | 09.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 SO 13/20 | 09.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 214/22 | 26.04.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 BA 3/23 ER | 02.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 12/23 B ER | 06.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 BA 3/23 ER | 02.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 12/23 B ER | 06.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2023 | ||
| - | L 37 SF 233/21 EK AS | 17.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2023 | |||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 239/20 | 09.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 214/22 | 24.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 218/18 KL | 29.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 6/21 R | 22.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 20 AS 3523/18 | 22.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 179/20 | 09.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 R 166/18 ZV zuvor: S 24 R 166/18 ZV | 20.07.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 404/22 ZV | 22.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 8/23 B | 24.11.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 1199/19 ZV zuvor: S 24 R 1199/19 ZV | 02.11.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 540/22 ZV | 22.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 1836/18 ZV zuvor: S 24 R 1836/18 ZV | 06.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 509/22 ZV | 22.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 RS 1694/17 zuvor: S 24 RS 1694/17, S 24 RS 1851/14 | 04.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 499/22 ZV | 22.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 EG 14/20 | 13.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 40/20 | 20.12.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 30. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 SO 25/23 ER | 09.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 30. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 KR 937/21 | 08.02.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 94/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 30. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 36 SB 2818/20 | 16.02.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 5 SB 305/21 | 23.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 30. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 3093/22 | 30.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 386/23 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 R 3036/22 | 15.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 504/23 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 R 4123/19 | 19.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 235/22 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 KR 3591/20 | 21.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2069/21 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 R 1253/21 | 20.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 863/22 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 AS 1456/22 | 08.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 51/23 NZB | 05.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2046/22 | 09.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 26. Mai 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 131 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 131 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 131 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 SB 311/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-sb-311-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-sb-311-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 51/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-51-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-51-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 5011/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-5011-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-5011-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 214/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-214-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-214-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 12/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-12-23-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-12-23-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 12/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-12-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-12-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128985 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 233/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-233-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-233-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 214/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-214-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-214-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 6/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-6-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-6-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 179/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-179-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-179-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 404/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-404-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-404-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 540/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-540-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-540-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 509/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-509-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-509-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161347 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 499/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-499-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-499-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 EG 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-eg-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-eg-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 SO 25/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-so-25-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-so-25-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 937/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-937-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-937-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SB 305/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sb-305-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sb-305-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 386/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-386-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-386-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159009 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 504/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-504-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-504-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 235/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-235-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-235-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2069/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2069-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2069-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 863/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-863-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-863-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 51/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-51-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-51-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2046/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2046-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2046-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 SB 311/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-sb-311-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-sb-311-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => eb4b3710007d89b8cc8ce5c7074c7e2d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1d496d59de437f8163dcfaa77aef6003:0.62277000 1747594611 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.