Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 40 SF 59/17 E | 20.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 SF 1/18 B (AS) | 06.02.2018 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 52 SF 1/21 DS | 20.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 SF 5/21 DS (KR) | 14.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 26. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 17 U 220/21 | 23.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 26. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 3 KR 559/17 | 27.09.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 26. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 17 U 220/21 | 23.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 26. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 3 KR 559/17 | 27.09.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 26. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 26 AY 2/23 ER | 06.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 26. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 242/23 ER | 14.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 25. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 30 SO 245/22 ER | 12.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 19/23 B ER | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 25. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 32 KR 351/19 | 11.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 25. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 203/09 | 24.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 169/20 ZVW | 22.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 25. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 193/22 | 20.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 7 VE 13/20 | 27.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 8/22 | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 32/22 B | 25.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 24. Mai 2023 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 19 SO 50/21 | 01.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 112/22 B | 25.04.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 19 SO 50/21 | 01.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 112/22 B | 25.04.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 3350/22 | 09.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 23. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 22 AS 4095/17 | 13.02.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AS 879/20 | 17.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 21 AS 2808/19 | 08.06.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 71/22 | 18.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 64/23 B | 19.10.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Mai 2023 |
Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 1032/22 | 02.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 SF 82/22 E | 27.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. Mai 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 BA 82/21 ER | 19.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 130/22 B ER | 07.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 R 1381/16 | 16.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 BA 62/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. Mai 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 234/17 | 29.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 108/21 | 21.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 2/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 22. Mai 2023 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 234/17 | 29.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 108/21 | 21.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 2/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 22. Mai 2023 |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 14 AL 4/23 | 15.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 22. Mai 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 133 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 133 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 133 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SF 1/18 B (AS) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sf-1-18-b-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sf-1-18-b-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 SF 5/21 DS (KR) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-sf-5-21-ds-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-sf-5-21-ds-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 220/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-220-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-220-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 559/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-559-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-559-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 220/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-220-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-220-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 559/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-559-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-559-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AY 2/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ay-2-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ay-2-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 242/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-242-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-242-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SO 245/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-so-245-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-so-245-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 KR 351/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-kr-351-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-kr-351-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 169/20 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-169-20-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-169-20-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 193/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-193-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-193-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 VE 13/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ve-13-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ve-13-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 SO 50/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-so-50-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-so-50-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 112/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-112-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-112-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 3350/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-3350-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-3350-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 879/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-879-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-879-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 71/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-71-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-71-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 1032/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-1032-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-1032-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143472 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SF 82/22 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sf-82-22-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sf-82-22-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 BA 82/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ba-82-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ba-82-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 1381/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-1381-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-1381-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 234/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-234-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-234-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137109 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 108/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-108-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-108-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 4/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-4-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-4-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SF 1/18 B (AS) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sf-1-18-b-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sf-1-18-b-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3998bb0233b2ae686188957aee0f918a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a867dbd17b25a41ca692e1e006e1adcc:0.36727700 1747607736 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.