Erste InstanzAktenzeichen (1. Instanz)Datum (1. Instanz)Zweite InstanzAktenzeichen (2. Instanz)Datum (2. Instanz)Dritte InstanzAktenzeichen (3. Instanz)Datum (3. Instanz)GerichtErstellt
Sozialgericht OsnabrückS 40 SF 59/17 E20.11.2017Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-BremenL 15 SF 1/18 B (AS)06.02.2018-Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen26. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht OldenburgS 52 SF 1/21 DS20.09.2021Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-BremenL 16 SF 5/21 DS (KR)14.02.2023-Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen26. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht OsnabrückS 17 U 220/2123.03.2023--Sozialgericht Osnabrück26. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht OsnabrückS 3 KR 559/1727.09.2018--Sozialgericht Osnabrück26. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht OsnabrückS 17 U 220/2123.03.2023--Sozialgericht Osnabrück26. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht OsnabrückS 3 KR 559/1727.09.2018--Sozialgericht Osnabrück26. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht LüneburgS 26 AY 2/23 ER06.03.2023--Sozialgericht Lüneburg26. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht MünchenS 28 KA 242/23 ER14.04.2023--Sozialgericht München25. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 30 SO 245/22 ER12.12.2022Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-WestfalenL 12 SO 19/23 B ER--Sozialgericht Detmold25. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 32 KR 351/1911.05.2023--Sozialgericht Detmold25. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht FrankfurtS 20 SO 203/0924.08.2017Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 4 SO 169/20 ZVW22.02.2023-Sozialgericht Frankfurt25. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht MünchenS 46 AS 193/2220.04.2023--Sozialgericht München24. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht WiesbadenS 7 VE 13/2027.01.2022Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 1 VE 8/2218.08.2022BundessozialgerichtB 9 V 32/22 B25.01.2023Sozialgericht Wiesbaden24. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht MarburgS 19 SO 50/2101.06.2022Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 4 SO 112/22 B25.04.2023-Sozialgericht Marburg23. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht MarburgS 19 SO 50/2101.06.2022Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 4 SO 112/22 B25.04.2023-Sozialgericht Marburg23. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht KarlsruheS 12 AS 3350/2209.05.2023--Sozialgericht Karlsruhe23. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht ChemnitzS 22 AS 4095/1713.02.2019Sächsisches LandessozialgerichtL 10 AS 879/2017.03.2023-Sächsisches Landessozialgericht22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht ChemnitzS 21 AS 2808/1908.06.2021Sächsisches LandessozialgerichtL 4 AS 71/2218.04.2023BundessozialgerichtB 4 AS 64/23 B19.10.2023Sächsisches Landessozialgericht22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht MünchenS 7 KR 1032/2202.05.2023--Sozialgericht München22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht DuisburgS 10 SF 82/22 E27.03.2023--Sozialgericht Duisburg22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht DuisburgS 10 BA 82/21 ER19.08.2022Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-WestfalenL 8 BA 130/22 B ER07.11.2022-Sozialgericht Duisburg22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht DuisburgS 10 R 1381/1616.02.2023Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-WestfalenL 14 BA 62/23--Sozialgericht Duisburg22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht FrankfurtS 6 R 234/1729.03.2021Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 2 R 108/2121.02.2023BundessozialgerichtB 12 R 2/23 R-Sozialgericht Frankfurt22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht FrankfurtS 6 R 234/1729.03.2021Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 2 R 108/2121.02.2023BundessozialgerichtB 12 R 2/23 R-Sozialgericht Frankfurt22. Mai 2023
Sozialgericht GießenS 14 AL 4/2315.05.2023--Sozialgericht Gießen22. Mai 2023
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 133 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 133 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 133 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SF 1/18 B (AS) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sf-1-18-b-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sf-1-18-b-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 SF 5/21 DS (KR) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-sf-5-21-ds-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-sf-5-21-ds-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 220/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-220-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-220-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 559/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-559-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-559-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 220/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-220-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-220-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 559/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-559-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-559-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AY 2/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ay-2-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ay-2-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 242/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-242-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-242-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SO 245/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-so-245-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-so-245-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 KR 351/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-kr-351-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-kr-351-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 169/20 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-169-20-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-169-20-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 193/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-193-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-193-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 VE 13/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ve-13-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ve-13-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 SO 50/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-so-50-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-so-50-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 112/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-112-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-112-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 3350/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-3350-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-3350-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 879/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-879-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-879-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 71/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-71-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-71-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 1032/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-1032-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-1032-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143472 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SF 82/22 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sf-82-22-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sf-82-22-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 BA 82/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ba-82-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ba-82-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 1381/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-1381-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-1381-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 234/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-234-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-234-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137109 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 108/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-108-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-108-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 4/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-4-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-4-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SF 1/18 B (AS) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sf-1-18-b-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sf-1-18-b-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3998bb0233b2ae686188957aee0f918a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a867dbd17b25a41ca692e1e006e1adcc:0.36727700 1747607736 [wpftsi_session] => )