| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 VG 2309/21 | 28.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 1261/22 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 VK 240/20 | 20.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VK 2721/21 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 1 VG 194/22 | 29.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 1623/22 | 20.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 9 AL 2350/19 | 24.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 2575/21 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 BA 4006/18 | 19.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 1846/22 | 19.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 180/20 | 04.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 R 1379/20 | 23.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 17. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AS 662/19 | 21.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 806/19 | 29.11.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 U 886/12 | 07.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 751/16 | 05.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 17/20 R | 08.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 508/17 | 20.02.2019 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KR 3866/19 | 21.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 36 AL 276/20 | 13.08.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 48 SO 109/23 ER | 26.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 3 VE 3/16 | 21.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 15/22 | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 38/22 B | 11.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 16. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 3 VE 3/16 | 21.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 15/22 | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 38/22 B | 11.05.2023 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 16. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 66/13 | 16.07.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 397/19 | 16.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 11/20 R | 08.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 16 KR 710/20 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 177/21 | 24.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 11/22 R | 07.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 13 KR 868/18 | 21.09.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 1278/18 | 07.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 4/22 R | 07.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 22 KR 405/14 | 21.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16/4 KR 506/19 | 18.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 3/22 R | 07.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Mai 2023 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 9 SO 3/13 KL | 20.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 8/20 R | 08.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 215/21 | 05.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 85/21 | 31.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 1 AL 235/16 | 30.03.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 70/17 | 11.11.2021 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 1 AL 83/17 | 11.10.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 161/18 | 11.11.2021 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 392/22 | 04.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 15 AL 135/22 | 27.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 15. Mai 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 134 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 134 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 134 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3325, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 1261/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-1261-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-1261-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158984 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VK 2721/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vk-2721-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vk-2721-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 1623/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-1623-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-1623-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158976 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 2575/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-2575-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-2575-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 1846/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-1846-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-1846-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 180/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-180-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-180-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132006 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 1379/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-1379-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-1379-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 806/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-806-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-806-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 17/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-17-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:16:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:16:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-17-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KA 508/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-ka-508-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-ka-508-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 3866/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-3866-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-3866-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143783 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 AL 276/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-al-276-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-al-276-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 SO 109/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-so-109-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-so-109-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 VE 3/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-ve-3-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-ve-3-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134721 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 VE 15/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ve-15-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ve-15-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 11/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-11-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-11-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 11/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-11-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-11-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 4/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-4-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-4-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 3/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-3-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-3-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 8/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-8-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-8-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 85/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-85-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-85-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 70/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-70-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-70-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 161/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-161-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-161-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 392/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-392-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-392-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AL 135/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-al-135-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-al-135-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 1261/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-1261-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-1261-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3bce9c55af4e7de755505acc624c2c8d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:65fdae10e9acce962c448f620020a96f:0.44535700 1747628444 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.