| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 21 SB 165/17 | 06.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 96/19 | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 8/22 BH | 11.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 15. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 21 SB 165/17 | 06.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 96/19 | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 8/22 BH | 11.04.2023 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 15. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 61 KR 1906/20 | 31.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 208/22 | 11.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 36 AL 276/20 | 13.08.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 136/21 | 05.12.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 14 BA 34/21 | 25.11.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 7/23 B | 03.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1150/22 ER | 23.02.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 100/23 B ER | 04.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 25 P 12/15 | 29.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 P 34/20 | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 23 AS 231/20 | 17.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 336/21 | 27.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 4 BA 11/19 | 31.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 47/20 | 20.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 28 AS 447/21 | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 346/22 | 26.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 22 AS 1393/17 | 24.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 AS 229/21 B | 03.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 1 BA 23/22 | 07.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 12. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 15 KR 306/18 | 14.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 71/22 | 06.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 39/22 B | 27.03.2023 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 11. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 15 KR 306/18 | 14.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 71/22 | 06.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 39/22 B | 27.03.2023 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 11. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 508/17 | 20.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 14/19 | 30.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 223 KR 1921/20 | 26.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 10. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 26 AL 10/19 | 12.01.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 21/21 | 16.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 1 AS 1295/20 | 03.11.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AS 1044/20 B | 17.04.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 9 AS 2769/16 | 17.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 629/20 | 06.04.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 28 AL 263/19 | 09.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 11/20 | 30.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 151/19 ZV zuvor S 33 R 151/19 ZV | 06.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 503/22 ZV | 20.04.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 5 KR 143/22 ER | 08.07.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 76/22 B ER | 04.04.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 26 AY 7/23 ER | 17.03.2023 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AY 19/23 B ER | 05.04.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 28 KR 383/15 | 11.08.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 17/17 | 21.06.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 32 KR 2389/19 | 21.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 38723 KH | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 9. Mai 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 135 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 135 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 135 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 SB 165/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-sb-165-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-sb-165-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 96/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-96-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-96-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 208/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-208-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-208-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 136/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-136-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-136-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 7/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-7-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-7-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 100/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-100-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:11:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:11:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-100-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 P 34/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-p-34-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-p-34-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 336/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-336-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-336-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 47/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-47-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-47-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138678 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 346/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-346-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-346-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 229/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-229-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-229-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 23/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-23-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-23-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 306/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-306-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-306-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134959 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 71/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-71-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-71-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 14/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-14-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-14-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 223 KR 1921/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-223-kr-1921-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-223-kr-1921-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 21/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-21-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-21-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 1044/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-1044-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-1044-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 629/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-629-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-629-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 11/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-11-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-11-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 503/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-503-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-503-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 76/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-76-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-76-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150484 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AY 19/23 - [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ay-19-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ay-19-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150481 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 178/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-178-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-178-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 KR 2389/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-kr-2389-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-kr-2389-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 SB 165/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-sb-165-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-sb-165-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 362a6a77503cc389567fd2dbeea1ac3e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d65f1ea15867bf681ba5fa79d29499c6:0.79629300 1747633016 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.