| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 63 KR 14/18 | 13.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 346/18 | 16.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 13/20 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 21 KR 402/14 | 09.07.2021 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 7/21 R | 22.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 U 3581/17 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 4485/18 | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 14/20 R | 08.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 10 SF 73/22 E | 05.05.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 8. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 36 KR 603/17 | 24.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 581/21 | 30.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 25/22 BH | 30.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 6 AS 1653/18 | 19.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 668/21 | 25.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 197/22 AR | 05.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 87 AS 411/17 | 24.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 175/22 | 05.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 154/22 BH | 16.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 1465/20 | 02.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 530/22 B KH | 26.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 1631/17 | 10.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 439/20 | 31.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 31/22 B, B 12 KR 2/23 C | 30.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 823/17 | 02.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1360/21 | 08.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 17 U 596/18 | 12.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 268/22 B | 11.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 SO 265/21 | 27.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 5. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 205/19 | 09.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 34/21 | 21.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 2263/13 | 02.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 550/16 | 26.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 17/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 187 U 287/15 | 30.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 178/18 | 21.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 139/20 | 25.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 66/21 | 21.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 27 AS 696/20 | 05.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 505/22 NZB | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 179/22 B ER | 27.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 240/22 B ER | 15.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 186 AS 773/16 | 02.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1888/17 | 30.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AS 38/17 | 28.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 643/19 | 29.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 4. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AS 662/19 | 21.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 806/19 | 29.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 4. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 33 AS 774/16 | 24.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 590/20 WA | 06.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 60/21 R | 22.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 3 KR 605/16 | 13.06.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 110/19 | 01.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 13/21 R | 22.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 R 1510/20 | 14.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1054/21 | 03.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 16 AL 2157/20 | 10.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 1765/22 | 03.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 136 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 136 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 136 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 13/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-13-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-13-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 7/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-7-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-7-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 14/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-14-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-14-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SF 73/22 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sf-73-22-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sf-73-22-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 581/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-581-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-581-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 668/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-668-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-668-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 175/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-175-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-175-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148922 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 530/22 B KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-530-22-b-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-530-22-b-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 439/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-439-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-439-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1360/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1360-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1360-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 268/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-268-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-268-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 265/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-265-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-265-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 34/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-34-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-34-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 550/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-550-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-550-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 178/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-178-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-178-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 66/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-66-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-66-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128966 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 505/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-505-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-505-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 240/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-240-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-240-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1888/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1888-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1888-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 38/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-38-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-38-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 662/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-662-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-662-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 60/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-60-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-60-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 13/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-13-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-13-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1054/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1054-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1054-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 1765/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-1765-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-1765-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 13/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-13-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-13-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d1ee94a5c8869ef21df0a06d557a3bb8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6a92242f833a2a0bb5085bb4f485af32:0.30088700 1747644878 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.