| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 KR 7/21 | 13.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2099/22 | 28.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 7 KR 1575/18 | 31.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1579/21 | 28.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 SF 2577/21 E | 11.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 230/23 E-B | 04.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 4 U 4025/18 | 21.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3113/19 | 19.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 3 U 66/20 | 24.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2662/21 | 23.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 1686/20 | 01.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2502/22 | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 83/21 | 23.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 997/22 | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 U 4564/20 | 28.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3877/21 | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 R 1515/19 | 24.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1000/21 | 16.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 VG 89/20 | 05.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 982/21 | 16.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 SB 168/20 | 03.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1695/22 | 16.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 823/16 | 08.04.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 10/20 | 25.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 3. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 303/16 | 17.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 73/17 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 AL 1/21 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 1120/17 | 10.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2653/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 10/20 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Mai 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 12 AS 4461/16 | 20.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 366/21 | 20.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 6 R 457/19 | 20.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 239/21 | 05.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 18 AS 257/19 | 02.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 47/21 | 25.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 23 U 25/17 | 21.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 49/21 | 02.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AS 1041/22 ER | 26.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 56/23 B ER | 23.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AL 78/18 | 15.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 15/22 | 16.11.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 119/21 | 27.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 2. Mai 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 14 KR 154/19 | 29.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 247/20 | 16.03.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 15/19 | 26.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SF 14/23 AB | 03.04.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 2. Mai 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 15 AL 1369/20 | 10.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 303/22 | 31.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 1 R 2935/21 | 22.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2633/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. April 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 137 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 137 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 137 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3400, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2099/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2099-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2099-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1579/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1579-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1579-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 230/23 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-230-23-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-230-23-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158950 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3113/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3113-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3113-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2662/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2662-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2662-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2502/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2502-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2502-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 997/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-997-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-997-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3877/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3877-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3877-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1000/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1000-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1000-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 982/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-982-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-982-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1695/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1695-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1695-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 10/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-10-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-10-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 AL 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-al-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-al-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 10/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-10-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-10-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161704 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 366/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-366-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-366-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 239/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-239-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-239-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 47/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-47-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-47-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 49/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-49-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-49-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 56/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-56-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-56-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 15/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-15-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-15-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 119/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-119-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-119-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149859 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 154/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-154-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-154-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SF 14/23 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-sf-14-23-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-sf-14-23-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 303/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-303-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-303-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2633/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2633-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2633-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2099/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2099-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2099-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4c9905ae6ee382039a8ae19bf42b1e9c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6bbf544011c03e15f19d1a51d465e51f:0.25014900 1747653870 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.