| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 166/20 ER | 06.05.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 25. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 65/21 | 24.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 25. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 R 90/16 | 19.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 223/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 25. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 42 AS 1098/19 | 20.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 25. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 13 AS 1534/21 | 22.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 25. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 3538/19 | 06.12.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 216/22 B | 28.03.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 25. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 110/22 | 11.04.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 100/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 24. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 P 195/22 | 29.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 311/22 | 21.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 24. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 AS 1919/21 | 17.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 499/22 | 17.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 R 2124/14 | 12.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 138/18 | 14.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 AY 3417/22 ER | 27.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 335/23 ER-B | 04.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 2537/18 | 31.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 891/20 | 20.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 83/21 | 23.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 997/22 | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 U 4564/20 | 28.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3877/21 | 23.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 AS 1673/18 | 14.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2705/20 | 16.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 1 SB 1192/21 | 23.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3065/22 | 16.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 VG 737/18 | 06.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 1749/22 | 16.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 18 SB 275/22 | 02.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 1936/22 | 29.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 SB 1415/21 | 02.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 2832/21 | 29.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 AS 78/20 | 26.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 21. April 2023 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 161/21 EK AS | 17.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. April 2023 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 161/21 EK AS | 17.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 480/19 | 04.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 59/20 | 10.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. April 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 55/21 EK AS | 22.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. April 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 139 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 139 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 139 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 166/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-166-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-166-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 65/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-65-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-65-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143460 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Urteil S 10 R 90/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => urteil-s-10-r-90-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/urteil-s-10-r-90-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 AS 1098/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-as-1098-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-as-1098-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 1534/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-1534-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-1534-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131405 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 216/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-216-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-216-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 110/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-110-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-110-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 P 195/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-p-195-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-p-195-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136896 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 311/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-311-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-311-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 499/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-499-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-499-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 138/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-138-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-138-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 335/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-335-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-335-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 891/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-891-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-891-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 997/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-997-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-997-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3877/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3877-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3877-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2705/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2705-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2705-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3065/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3065-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3065-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 1749/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-1749-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-1749-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 1936/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-1936-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-1936-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 2832/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-2832-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-2832-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 78/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-78-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-78-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 161/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-161-21-ek-as-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-161-21-ek-as-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 161/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-161-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-161-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 59/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-59-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-59-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128951 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 55/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-55-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-55-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 166/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-166-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-166-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 792292fbca4787881dbdf5156d669fa3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:373b64904643f59ef272b68ca9fd594e:0.03588100 1747666874 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.