| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2166/22 | 23.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 20. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 14 KR 221/22 | 27.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 20. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 14 P 74/22 | 22.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 76/22 | 30.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 12 KR 365/20 | 25.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 567/20 | 02.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 23 U 97/19 | 12.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 66/21 | 18.01.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 P 41/18 | 19.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 P 13/20 | 25.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 12 U 146/15 | 01.02.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 120/18 | 20.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 AS 856/19 | 27.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 19. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 SO 138/22 | 18.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 19. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 78 KR 1492/20 | 21.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 19. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 13 KR 433/19 | 08.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 276/20 | 25.11.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 424/13 | 15.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 R 326/17 | 24.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 67/18 | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 14/20 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 19/20 R | 08.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 22 BK 17/20 | 13.10.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 BK 2/20 NZB | 24.08.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 RS 61/17 zuvor S 24 RS 61/17, S 37 RS 61/17, S 24 R 372/19 ZV | 04.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 486/22 ZV | 06.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 7/23 B | 07.09.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 356/19 ZV zuvor S 24 R 356/19 ZV | 06.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 510/22 ZV | 06.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 5/23 B | 07.09.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 24 AS 1322/18 | 24.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 55/20 | 14.02.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 230/19 | 16.03.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 67/20 | 20.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 298/19 ZV zuvor S 33 R 298/19 ZV, S 24 RS 2028/14 | 01.11.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 527/22 ZV | 06.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 6/23 B | 07.09.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 296/19 ZV zuvor S 33 R 296/19/ZV, S 16 RS 1665/14 | 01.11.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 520/22 ZV | 06.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 4/23 B | 07.09.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 130/22 | 15.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 17. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 11 KR 20/14 | 22.11.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 66/17 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 16/20 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 1949/15 | 08.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 164/19 | 09.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 AS 1124/20 WA | 22.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 283/22 | 21.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 74/17 | 24.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 24/21 | 23.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. April 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 140 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 140 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 140 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2166/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2166-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2166-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 221/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-221-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-221-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 76/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-76-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-76-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 567/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-567-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-567-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 66/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-66-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-66-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 13/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-13-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-13-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 120/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-120-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-120-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 856/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-856-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-856-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140318 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 138/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-138-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-138-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137569 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 78 KR 1492/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-78-kr-1492-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-78-kr-1492-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 276/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-276-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-276-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 326/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-326-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-326-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 19/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-19-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-19-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BK 2/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-bk-2-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-bk-2-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161316 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 486/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-486-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-486-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 510/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-510-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-510-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 55/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-55-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-55-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 67/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-67-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-67-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 527/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-527-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-527-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 520/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-520-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-520-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 130/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-130-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-130-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 16/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-16-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-16-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 164/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-164-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-164-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 283/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-283-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:53:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:53:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-283-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 24/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-24-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-24-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2166/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2166-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2166-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2c5ecce01dbb4809f609046a83906430 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:09e2e826bebc18ad569ea05b69783972:0.43217200 1747815802 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.