| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 820/17 | 14.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 67/19 | 13.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 2/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 221 KR 2279/17 | 04.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 188/20 | 13.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 941/16 | 14.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 497/17 | 14.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 941/16 | 14.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 497/17 | 14.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 224 KR 1929/20 | 31.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 361/21 | 14.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 442/18 | 05.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 357/20 | 15.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 10 R 389/18 | 18.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 22/22 | 30.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 BA 141/18 | 23.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 BA 76/19 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 120 AL 771/20 | 15.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 46/22 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 1158/18 | 03.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 186/20 | 25.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 360/18 | 05.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 BA 46/19 | 07.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 59/20 | 17.05.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 108/21 | 10.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 143/22 B | 28.02.2023 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 59/20 | 17.05.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 108/21 | 10.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 143/22 B | 28.02.2023 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 59/20 | 17.05.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 108/21 | 10.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 143/22 B | 28.02.2023 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 U 35/19 | 09.12.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 368/20 | 16.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 125/22 | 16.08.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 384/22 | 16.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 53 R 507/19 | 22.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 883/19 | 13.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 29/21 R | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 21 R 213/16 | 27.08.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 160/18 | 21.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 31/21 R | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Schwerin | S 7 R 228/11 | 06.08.2013 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 4 R 269/13 | 13.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 7/20 R | 18.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 59 KR 2341/16 | 19.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 125/19 | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 14/20 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 29 AS 2751/19 | 07.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 189/20 | 05.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 64/21 R | 29.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. April 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 396/20 | 16.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 12. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 276/21 | 07.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 12. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 353/21 | 09.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 12. April 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 223/19 | 09.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 12. April 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 142 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 142 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 142 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 67/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-67-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-67-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 188/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-188-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-188-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 497/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-497-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-497-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 497/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-497-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-497-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 361/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-361-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-361-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 357/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-357-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-357-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128826 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 22/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-22-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-22-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 76/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-76-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-76-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128813 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 46/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-46-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-46-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 186/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-186-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-186-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 46/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-46-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-46-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 59/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-59-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-59-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 108/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-108-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-108-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 108/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-108-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-108-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 368/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-368-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-368-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 384/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-384-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-384-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 29/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-29-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-29-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 31/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-31-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-31-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87922 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 7/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-7-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-7-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 14/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-14-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-14-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 64/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-64-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-64-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 U 396/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-u-396-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-u-396-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 U 276/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-u-276-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-u-276-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 U 353/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-u-353-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-u-353-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 U 223/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-u-223-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-u-223-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 67/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-67-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-67-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => edc6c579b9b89f19a7c499fc991a344f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f14db9290083fcbe46dce0be2fc984b1:0.26464600 1747695956 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.