| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 276/21 | 25.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 29. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 U 11/16 | 04.07.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 287/16 | 01.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 107/22 B | 02.03.2023 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 29. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2454/22 | 10.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 29. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 3895/15 | 26.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 29/19 | 09.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 23/22 B | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 98 U 254/16 WA | 15.10.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 28. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 17 R 274/17 | 01.04.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 28. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 SO 11/18, S 7 SO 19/21 | 14.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 35/21 | 07.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 7 AS 2127/16 | 23.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 343/21 | 09.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 1228/15 | 08.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 179/19 | 09.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 4 AS 3235/13 | 24.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 294/18 | 15.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 60/18 | 18.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 2/22 | 22.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 1773/15 | 14.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 99/19 | 09.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 22 AS 1005/22 ER | 29.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 12/23 B ER | 02.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 13/21 | 15.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 12/21 | 15.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 11/23 ER | 22.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 13 AS 769/21 | 07.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 27. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 16 AL 131/18 | 27.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 120/21 | 08.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 18 AY 140/21 | 09.09.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 110/22 | 09.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 1866/21 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1360/22 | 17.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 R 1890/16 | 11.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 421/20 | 14.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 R 1515/19 | 24.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1000/21 | 16.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 R 506/21 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 1448/22 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 17 R 3202/20 | 02.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 855/22 | 17.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 17 R 3017/20 | 28.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 R 854/22 | 17.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 145 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 145 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 145 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 276/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-276-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-276-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140345 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 11/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-11-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-11-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2454/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2454-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2454-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 BA 23/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ba-23-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:15:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:15:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ba-23-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 98 U 254/16 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-98-u-254-16-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-98-u-254-16-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140316 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 274/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-274-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-274-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 35/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-35-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-35-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 343/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-343-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-343-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 179/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-179-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-179-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 294/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-294-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-294-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 2/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-2-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-2-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 99/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-99-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-99-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 12/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-12-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-12-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143735 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 13/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-13-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-13-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143732 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 12/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-12-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-12-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 11/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-11-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-11-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 769/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-769-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-769-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 120/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-120-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-120-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 110/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-110-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-110-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1360/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1360-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1360-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 421/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-421-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-421-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158745 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1000/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1000-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1000-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1448/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1448-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1448-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 855/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-855-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-855-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 854/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-854-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-854-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 276/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-276-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:43:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:43:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-276-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => dc1673c47722b5b73f888273a1c2bf49 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:afcd2ef6f6560bba2ab474cca924fbde:0.72953900 1747715868 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.