| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 1 BA 246/19 | 21.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 2392/22 | 15.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 2540/14 | 05.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 135/19 | 20.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 1940/22 | 22.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3464/22 | 02.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 307/21 | 19.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 2466/22 | 02.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 KR 5305/18 | 09.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3181/20 | 31.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 BA 2682/19 | 19.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 2231/20 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 R 506/21 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 1448/22 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 AS 886/21 | 01.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 3802/21 | 24.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 98 U 50/21 | 16.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 24. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 KA 4/21 | 26.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 642/22 ER | 16.09.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 231/22 B ER | 09.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 642/22 ER | 16.09.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 231/22 B ER | 09.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 24. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 510/17 | 19.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 24/19 | 10.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 83/22 EK R | 20.01.2023 | B 10 ÜG 5/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 100/21 | 08.09.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 340/21 | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 4/23 R | 16.05.2024 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 967/19 | 17.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 365/20 | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 7/23 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 AS 7486/12 | 16.10.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 1188/16 | 19.01.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 AS 7486/12 | 16.10.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 1188/16 | 19.01.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 36 KR 717/19 | 18.05.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 320/20 | 14.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 35 AS 1619/15 WA | 13.10.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 1138/16 B | 13.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 43 SO 169/21 | 25.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 23. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 29 AS 591/16 | 09.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 572/19 | 24.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 23. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 29 AS 591/16 | 09.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 572/19 | 24.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 6/23 R | 11.09.2024 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 23. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 6 AS 893/21 | 09.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 117/22 B | 24.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 12 Vs 160/93 | 10.02.1994 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 VS 7/94 | 29.06.1994 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. März 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 146 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 146 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 146 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 2392/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-2392-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-2392-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 135/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-135-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-135-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3464/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3464-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3464-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 2466/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-2466-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-2466-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3181/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3181-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3181-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 2231/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-2231-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-2231-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1448/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1448-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1448-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 3802/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-3802-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-3802-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 98 U 50/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-98-u-50-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-98-u-50-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KA 4/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ka-4-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ka-4-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 642/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-642-22-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-642-22-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 642/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-642-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-642-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 24/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-24-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-24-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 83/22 EK R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-83-22-ek-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-83-22-ek-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 340/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-340-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-340-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 365/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-365-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-365-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1188/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1188-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1188-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161293 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1188/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1188-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1188-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 320/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-320-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-320-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1138/16 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1138-16-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1138-16-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137567 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Urteil [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => urteil-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/urteil-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 591/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-591-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-591-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 572/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-572-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-572-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 117/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-117-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-117-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 VS 7/94 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-vs-7-94 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:52:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:52:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-vs-7-94/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 2392/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-2392-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-2392-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1b6afbed38f1b146ab9c01d8ac10a7f8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c2a18d140d1dcbf3fdd25cae37812f52:0.22824100 1747744126 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.