| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 AS 3858/15 | 19.01.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 155/16 | 19.01.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 1375/18 ZV | 04.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 500/22 ZV | 09.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 RS 1693/17 | 04.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 498/22 ZV | 09.03.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 2606/20 | 27.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 16. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 9 KR 360/21 | 20.10.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 463/21 | 19.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 3/23 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 16. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 9 KR 360/21 | 20.10.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 463/21 | 19.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 3/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 16. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 625/19 | 10.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 81/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 15 U 5042/20 | 01.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 236/22 | 27.01.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 9 SB 124/17 | 17.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SB 4/19 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 1/20 R | 27.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 61/18 | 30.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 52/19 | 11.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 1/22 R | 06.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 4108/18 | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3937/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KS 2/21 R | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 19 KR 1179/14 | 05.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3211/17 | 25.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 37/21 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 15 KR 226/17 | 18.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 743/18 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 33/21 R | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 KG 2/19 | 31.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 KG 1/21 | 22.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 10 AS 168/18 | 24.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 345/22 B | 14.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 4 R 254/17 | 01.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 25/19 | 25.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 6 R 11/22 | 12.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 108/22 | 15.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 R 287/19 | 09.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 285/21 | 10.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 34 SF 170/16 E | 22.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 319/20 B | 17.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 28 AS 1776/15 | 24.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 413/19 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 10 SO 51/17 | 17.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 34/20 | 02.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 10 SF 12/21 EK | - | 10.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 R 985/13 | 19.05.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 BA 27/18 | 11.03.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 R 320/20 | 17.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 70/21 | 11.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AS 1228/17 | 29.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 339/21 | 11.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 149 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 149 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 149 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3700, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 155/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-155-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:36:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:36:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-155-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 500/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-500-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-500-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 498/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-498-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-498-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 91 KR 2606/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-91-kr-2606-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-91-kr-2606-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 360/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-360-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-360-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 463/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-463-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-463-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 81/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-81-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-81-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 236/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-236-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-236-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 1/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-1-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-1-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KS 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-ks-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-ks-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 37/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-37-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-37-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 33/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-33-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-33-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161667 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KG 1/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kg-1-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:49:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:49:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kg-1-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 345/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-345-22-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:49:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:49:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-345-22-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 25/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-25-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:49:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:49:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-25-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 108/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-108-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:49:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:49:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-108-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 285/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-285-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:49:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:49:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-285-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 319/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-319-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:49:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:49:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-319-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 413/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-413-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:49:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:49:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-413-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 34/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-34-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-34-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 12/21 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-12-21-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-12-21-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 27/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-27-18-3 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-27-18-3/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 70/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-70-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-70-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 339/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-339-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-339-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 155/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-155-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:36:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:36:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-155-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 095b121a18e242deeea7013d20b279c8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6f469f2aa9a887cdef79e04ca899f988:0.38310200 1747766831 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.