| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 241/17 | 25.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 246/19 | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 29/22 R | 16.05.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Oktober 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 663/19 | 31.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1714/21 | 21.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 KR 2427/20 | 14.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2292/22 | 21.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 KR 130/21 | 28.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 40/24 | 02.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 AS 867/21 | 03.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 3327/22 | 16.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 RA 3085/98 | 26.07.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 RA 3025/00 | 19.06.2002 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 2306/23 | 04.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 R 1394/19 | 08.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 38 SO 31/24 ER | 12.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 19 AS 392/23 | 25.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 SO 120/21 | 09.08.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 226/22 | 10.09.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 AY 11/21 | 20.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 76/22 | 29.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 KR 960/21 | 09.08.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 364/22 | 25.06.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 KR 1744/20 | 09.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 6 R 1216/20 | 18.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 193/22 | 26.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 157 1814/22 | 07.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 36/23 | 26.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 2493/19 | 15.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1577/24 | 02.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 692/22 | 14.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2018/23 | 17.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 R 3696/20 | 08.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 3410/20 | 01.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 SO 2207/23 | 26.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 376/24 | 18.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 SO 55/22 | 11.09.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 62/23 EK AS | 24.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 BA 398/18 | 14.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 68/21 | 22.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 1751/18 WA | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 103/21 | 29.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 25 P 38/20 | 21.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 P 62/23 | 26.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22. Oktober 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 15 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 15 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 15 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 29/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-29-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-29-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1714/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1714-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1714-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2292/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2292-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2292-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 40/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-40-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-40-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 3327/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-3327-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-3327-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 RA 3025/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ra-3025-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ra-3025-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 2306/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-2306-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-2306-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 1394/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-1394-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-1394-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 SO 31/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-so-31-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-so-31-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 392/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-392-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-392-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 226/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-226-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-226-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 76/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-76-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-76-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 364/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-364-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-364-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 KR 1744/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-kr-1744-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-kr-1744-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129735 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 193/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-193-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-193-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129732 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 36/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-36-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-36-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1577/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1577-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1577-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2018/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2018-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2018-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 3410/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-3410-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-3410-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 376/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-376-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-376-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 SO 55/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-so-55-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-so-55-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 62/23 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-62-23-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-62-23-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 68/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-68-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-68-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 103/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-103-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-103-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 P 62/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-p-62-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-p-62-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 29/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-29-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-29-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 664d50f7e9927d3d5ad12f1d668ac651 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1401fb20f4fe3825f3772a4806d02e8a:0.85166800 1745010656 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.