| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 28 AS 636/22 ER | 12.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 463/22 B ER | 31.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 AS 419/19 WA | 23.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 547/21 | 11.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 21 KR 21/15 | 10.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 9/18 | 12.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 VE 6/22 ER | - | 23.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 23 SB 140/17 | 29.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 SB 86/21 | 22.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 10 SF 13/21 EK | 10.02.2022 | 10.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 42 SO 30/19 | 09.11.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 12/23 B | 07.08.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 17 SF 3/18 E | 20.03.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 164/20 B E | 15.02.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 1898/21 | 17.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 14. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 159/14 | 15.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 74/19 | 26.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 150/22 B | 21.02.2023 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 14. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 7 VE 13/20 | 27.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 8/22 | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 32/22 B | 25.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 14. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 9 R 544/17 | 30.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 308/18 | 15.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 15 R 626/14 | 19.07.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 498/18 | 15.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 U 803/15 | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1606/19 | 15.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 15 R 1126/19 | 18.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3357/19 | 27.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 U 3712/15 | 20.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 436/18 | 29.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 BA 1364/19 | 19.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 624/21 | 15.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 1509/18 | 08.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 3903/21 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 4161/18 | 08.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 3902/21 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 2967/16 | 01.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 527/19 | 31.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 AY 2594/21 ER | 26.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 3026/21 ER-B | 30.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 KA 164/20 | 12.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 13. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 15 AL 77/21 | 30.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 28/22 WA | 11.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 15/22 BH | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 15 AL 77/21 | 30.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 28/22 WA | 11.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 15/22 BH | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 SO 110/19 | 11.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 296/19 | 27.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 50/22 BH | 17.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13. März 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 150 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 150 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 150 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 463/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-463-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-463-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 547/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-547-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-547-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 9/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-9-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-9-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 VE 6/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ve-6-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ve-6-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SB 86/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sb-86-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sb-86-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 13/21 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-13-21-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-13-21-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 12/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-12-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-12-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 164/20 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-164-20-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-164-20-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 1898/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-1898-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-1898-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 74/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-74-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-74-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 VE 8/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ve-8-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ve-8-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 308/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-308-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-308-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 498/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-498-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-498-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1606/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1606-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1606-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3357/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3357-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3357-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 436/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-436-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-436-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 624/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-624-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-624-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 3903/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-3903-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-3903-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 3902/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-3902-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-3902-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 527/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-527-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-527-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 3026/21 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-3026-21-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-3026-21-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KA 164/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ka-164-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ka-164-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 28/22 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-28-22-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-28-22-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AL 77/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-al-77-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-al-77-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 296/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-296-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-296-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 463/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-463-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:48:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:48:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-463-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b04bf2081dfbb22ed63f381dc03a204e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b3319bf5c6ad8d2da40e240ee3ff709c:0.80668500 1747791074 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.