| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 204/14 | 18.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 52/19 | 24.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 204/14 | 18.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 52/19 | 24.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 47/21 | 09.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 855/21 | 17.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 AS 886/21 | 01.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 3802/21 | 24.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 SF 451/20 E | 28.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 1600/20 E-B | 13.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 902/22 | 16.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2459/22 | 13.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 AS 520/20 | 16.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2551/22 | 22.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 24 R 5839/17 | 24.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 BA 1441/22 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 R 2013/16 | 28.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 BA 24/20 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 AS 1786/20 | 22.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 3931/21 | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 1944/22 ER | 29.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 304/23 ER-B | 01.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 15 SO 13/19 B | 17.06.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 62/22 B | 09.12.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 14 KR 136/22 | 21.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 9. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2046/22 | 24.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 9. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SO 1830/21 | 15.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 9. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 12 P 97/22 | 24.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 9. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 SO 102/19 | 07.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 180/19 | 27.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 6/21 AR | 04.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 SO 147/19 | 07.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 5/20 | 27.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 51/22 BH | 17.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 P 209/18 | 15.01.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 5/21 | 02.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 73/17 | 07.08.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 508/19 | 17.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 SO 4/16 | 15.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 308/18 | 06.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 7/21 R | 06.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 3 SO 620/19 | 12.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 61/21 | 28.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 2/21 R | 06.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 KR 253/18 | 25.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 51/20 | 26.01.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 8. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 270/20 | 12.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 384/21 | 01.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 8. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 270/20 | 12.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 384/21 | 01.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 8. März 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 151 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 151 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 151 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 204/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-204-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-204-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 52/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-52-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-52-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 855/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-855-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-855-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 3802/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-3802-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-3802-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 1600/20 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-1600-20-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-1600-20-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2459/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2459-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2459-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2551/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2551-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2551-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 1441/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-1441-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-1441-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 24/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-24-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-24-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 3931/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-3931-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-3931-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 304/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-304-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-304-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150471 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 62/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-62-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-62-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 136/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-136-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-136-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2046/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2046-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2046-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SO 1830/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-so-1830-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-so-1830-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Urteil SG Dortmund [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => urteil-sg-dortmund [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/urteil-sg-dortmund/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 180/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-180-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-180-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137030 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 5/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-5-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-5-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 5/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-5-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-5-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 508/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-508-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-508-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87904 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 7/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-7-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-7-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 253/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-253-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-253-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 270/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-270-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-270-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 384/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-384-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-384-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 204/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-204-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-204-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d65bb00b20c60cfb9c2215352614cfef [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8ac20117bf9ea4ce579b419e2479dce4:0.12374000 1747790918 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.