| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 R 405/20 | 08.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 571/21 | 12.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 49/22 BH | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 8. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 2071/18 | 01.07.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 8. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 25/22 | 03.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 8. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 22/22 | 03.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 8. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 2 R 842/18 | 11.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 320/20 | 28.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 2 U 132/15 | 08.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 166/19 | 07.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 R 250/17 | 09.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 175/18 | 28.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 5/22 R | 13.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 KR 253/18 | 25.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 51/20 | 26.01.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 7. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 KR 253/18 | 25.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 51/20 | 26.01.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 7. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 487/15 | 10.10.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 682/22 | 01.12.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 7. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 487/15 | 10.10.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 682/22 | 01.12.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 7. März 2023 | ||
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 37/20 KL | 21.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 9/21 R | 17.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 R 246/17 | 09.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 173/18 | 28.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 6/22 R | 13.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 KR 2168/20 | 05.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 494/21 | 11.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 19/22 R | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 234/21 | 16.11.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 1/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 1 U 5029/22 | 17.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 6. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 AL 29/20 | 02.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 133/22 | 16.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 6. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 R 850/16 | 17.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 357/18 | 15.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 6. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 R 239/17 | 08.08.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 761/18 | 30.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 6. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 R 139/21 | 14.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 572/21 | 12.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 50/22 BH | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 6. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 U 1798/21 | 27.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 2032/22 | 27.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 EG 4/20 | 13.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 3. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 R 850/16 | 17.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 357/18 | 15.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. März 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 298/21 EK AS | 20.01.2023 | B 10 ÜG 3/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2023 | |||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 71/22 EK SO | 20.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 4/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 152 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 152 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 152 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 405/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-405-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-405-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 2071/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-2071-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-2071-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 25/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-25-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-25-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 22/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-22-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-22-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 320/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-320-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-320-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128785 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 166/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-166-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-166-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 5/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-5-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-5-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 51/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-51-08 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-51-08/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 51/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-51-08 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-51-08/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 682/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-682-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-682-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 682/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-682-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-682-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 9/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-9-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-9-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 6/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-6-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-6-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 19/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-19-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-19-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 234/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-234-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-234-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 5029/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-5029-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-5029-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AL 29/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-al-29-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-al-29-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 850/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-850-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-850-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 R 239/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-r-239-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-r-239-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 139/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-139-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-139-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 2032/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-2032-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-2032-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 EG 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-eg-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-eg-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 357/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-357-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-357-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 298/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-298-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-298-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 71/22 EK SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-71-22-ek-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-71-22-ek-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 405/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-405-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-405-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8a356816525ec669e9f237f140faa65d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:03a9e61aa2211abb64381d4d0904a111:0.02978700 1747817188 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.