| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 R 2111/17 | 23.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 2184/18 | 13.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 U 3357/17 | 13.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1737/21 | 17.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 R 2729/18 | 22.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 528/20 | 13.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 AS 2187/21 | 16.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2924/22 | 17.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 R 3831/20 | 01.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1353/22 | 15.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 AS 1751/22 ER | 07.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2988/22 B | 02.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 1582/20 | 30.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2531/21 | 17.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 1559/20 | 12.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1970/21 | 17.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 SB 633/20 | 22.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. März 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 10/21 | 27.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 35/21 | 14.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 255/20 | 17.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 169/21 | 07.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 39 AL 619/15 | 07.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 20/18 | 11.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 12/21 R | 29.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 4 KN 5/17 | 12.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 224/20 | 17.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 37/21 R | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 30 VG 36/17 | 08.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 70/21 | 26.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 35/22 B | 20.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. März 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 R 239/17 | 08.08.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 761/18 | 30.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 AL 29/20 | 02.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 133/22 | 16.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 16 AL 170/18 | 04.08.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 124/21 | 16.02.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 24 R 207/21 | 16.02.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 117/22 | 17.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 R 172/17 | 05.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 584/18 | 30.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 2582/17 | 26.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 67/20 | 07.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 184/19 WA | 13.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 79/20 | 20.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. März 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 P 67/19 | 06.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 35/20 | 17.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 28. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 931/21 | 12.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 28. Februar 2023 | ||||
| - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 20/20 EK AS | 13.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 8/22 B | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 190/20 | 26.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. Februar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 153 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 153 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 153 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 2184/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-2184-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-2184-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1737/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1737-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1737-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 528/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-528-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-528-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2924/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2924-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2924-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1353/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1353-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1353-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2988/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2988-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2988-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2531/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2531-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2531-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1970/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1970-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1970-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 SB 633/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-sb-633-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-sb-633-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 35/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-35-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-35-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 169/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-169-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-169-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 12/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-12-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-12-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 37/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-37-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-37-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 70/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-70-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-70-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130771 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 761/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-761-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-761-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 133/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-133-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-133-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 124/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-124-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-124-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 117/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-117-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-117-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 584/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-584-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-584-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 67/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-67-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-67-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 79/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-79-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-79-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140343 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 P 67/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-p-67-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-p-67-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 931/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-931-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-931-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 20/20 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-20-20-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-20-20-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 190/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-190-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-190-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 2184/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-2184-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-2184-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4ce2a4264146b6b4a9df4a612e5bfb19 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bc275ebc9eacc382fcc2e00e16470f70:0.16061800 1747816156 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.