| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 72/22 | 26.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 24 R 207/21 | 16.02.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 117/22 | 17.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 117/22 AR | 01.12.2022 | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 KA 5/21 | 05.10.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 1/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 SO 17/22 ER | 21.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 150/22 B ER | 14.12.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 AL 1205/15 | 14.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 1738/18 | 05.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 SB 871/17 | 16.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 500/19 | 09.11.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 SB 3535/16 | 23.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 2819/18 | 09.11.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SB 3371/18 | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 211/21 | 22.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 15 SB 3704/19 | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 2808/20 | 12.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SB 2226/19 | 23.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 376/22 | 25.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 AS 121/16 | 29.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 493/19 | 25.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 AS 3936/19 | 12.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 1365/21 | 16.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 AS 3000/17 | 30.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2141/21 | 21.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 48 SO 563/16 | 08.04.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 119/20 | 16.12.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 EG 2358/19 | 15.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 4175/19 | 18.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 4/20 R | 27.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 10 JR 15/18 | 22.08.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 35/20 | 14.12.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 1 SF 23/19 E | 04.03.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 30/22 B E | 13.02.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 39 R 284/17 | 19.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 75/20 | 21.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 22. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 7 AL 3736/18 | 19.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 1926/20 | 20.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 31/21 R | 22.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 18 SB 460/16 | 24.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 SB 381/17 | 07.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 4/21 R | 27.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 17 KR 696/19 | 19.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 443/21 | 24.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 24/22 BH | 16.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 1342/22 ER | 24.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 759/22 B ER | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 13 AL 107/18 | 16.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 107/18 | 14.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 23/22 B | 08.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 11 KR 452/11 WA | 24.10.2011 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 130/19 | 19.09.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 KR 649/22 | 19.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Februar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 154 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 154 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 154 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 72/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-72-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-72-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 R 207/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-r-207-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-r-207-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KA 5/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-ka-5-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-ka-5-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134748 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SO 17/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-so-17-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-so-17-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 1738/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-1738-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-1738-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 500/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-500-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-500-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 2819/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-2819-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-2819-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 211/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-211-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-211-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 2808/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-2808-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:58:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:58:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-2808-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 376/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-376-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-376-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 493/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-493-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-493-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1365/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1365-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1365-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2141/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2141-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2141-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 119/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-119-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-119-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87896 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 35/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-35-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-35-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 30/22 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-30-22-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-30-22-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 75/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-75-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-75-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 31/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-31-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-31-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 443/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-443-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:36:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:36:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-443-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 759/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-759-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-759-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AL 107/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-al-107-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-al-107-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 130/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-130-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-130-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 KR 649/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-kr-649-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-kr-649-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 72/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-72-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-72-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f74819c039c8d5d627530c0cfe8c18e5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6334c7c53eeded01828302680a9a2fa7:0.44207600 1747843844 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.