| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 23 R 1/16 | 14.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 332/20 | 13.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 181/22 B | 18.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 78/21 | 29.10.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 202/21 | 07.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 21. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 163 U 196/22 | 30.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 120/22 B PKH | 09.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 203 AS 59/22 ER | 13.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 981/22 B ER PKH | 16.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 111 P 803/15 | 23.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 P 52/16 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 356/22 ER | 15.12.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 20. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 39 AL 191/19 | 19.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 62/20 | 01.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 33/21 R | 29.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AL 86/21 | 14.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 3444/21 | 26.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 KR 1745/18 | 21.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1047/20 | 23.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 1052/21 | 21.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 3921/21 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 16 AS 1893/18 | 11.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 823/21 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 16 AS 5/19 | 28.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 824/21 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 KR 2674/21 | 02.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2403/22 NZB | 29.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 R 2641/17 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3396/19 | 12.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 AS 3639/21 | 04.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 772/22 | 17.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 U 5170/18 | 05.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 2157/21 | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 396/18 | 27.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 2636/20 | 28.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 7 U 2340/18 | 02.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3992/20 | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 791/16 | 19.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1783/18 | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 SO 126/21 | 09.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5 AS 662/22 ER | 07.10.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 447/22 B ER | 09.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5 AS 662/22 ER | 07.10.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 447/22 B ER | 09.02.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 17. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 AS 453/22 | 08.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 17. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 24 AS 2447/14 | 13.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1251/19 | 29.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 224/22 BH | 12.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 4 SB 1495/18 | 17.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 SB 94/20 | 10.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 34/22 B | 02.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Februar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 155 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 155 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 155 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 332/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-332-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-332-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 202/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-202-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-202-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 120/22 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-120-22-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-120-22-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128745 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 981/22 B ER PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-981-22-b-er-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-981-22-b-er-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 P 52/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-p-52-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-p-52-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 356/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-356-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-356-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87893 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 33/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-33-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-33-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 3444/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-3444-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-3444-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1047/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1047-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1047-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 3921/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-3921-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-3921-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 823/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-823-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-823-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 824/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-824-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-824-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2403/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2403-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2403-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3396/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3396-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3396-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 772/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-772-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-772-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158495 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 2157/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-2157-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-2157-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158491 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 2636/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-2636-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-2636-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158487 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3992/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3992-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3992-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1783/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1783-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1783-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 SO 126/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-so-126-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-so-126-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 662/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-662-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-662-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 447/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-447-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-447-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 453/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-453-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-453-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1251/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1251-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1251-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 94/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-94-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-94-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 332/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-332-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-332-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 845a1a5f3edea8dc555a81114ae192c7 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6f853829b898d553ff6de756457f8d72:0.24255000 1747843376 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.