| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 SO 58/22 ER | 05.07.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 211/22 B ER | 14.12.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 64/15 | 22.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 44/19 | 22.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 R 125/06 | 17.01.2009 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 945/12 ZVW | 04.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 42/22 BH | 16.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 SO 153/21 | 09.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 15. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 SO 163/22 ER | 15.12.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 343/22 B ER | 25.01.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 15. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 30 U 106/14 | 03.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 130/20 | 27.01.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 15. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 122/22 | 08.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 15. Februar 2023 | ||||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 361/21 | 23.01.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 15. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 22 KR 185/20 | 11.06.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 956/21 | 08.12.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 15. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 20 SO 143/15 | 09.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 179/19 | 17.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 40 SB 1189/16 | 22.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 192/19 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Februar 2023 | ||
| S 53 AS 6821/17 | 24.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 AS 1449/19 | 30.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Februar 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 KA 150/22 | 19.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 1/23 B | 18.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 SF 1/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 19 AS 365/21 | 18.06.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 377/21 | 18.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 42/22 C | 17.11.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 19 AS 490/20 | 17.08.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 460/21 | 18.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 72/22 BH | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 AS 65/19 | 15.02.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 98/22 | 22.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 31 R 5157/12 | 06.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 878/17 | 28.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 35 SO 538/18 | 05.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 181/19 | 02.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 81/21 B | 17.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 40 R 1217/20 | 16.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 217/22 | 21.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 129/22 AR | 23.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 KR 618/17 | 26.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 129/20 | 02.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 26/22 B | 16.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 13. Februar 2023 |
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 290/22 KL ER | 15.12.2022 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 3 KG 9/17 | 20.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KG 1/21 B | 22.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 15 U 43/14 | 11.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 219/17 | 18.10.2022 | B 2 U 165/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Februar 2023 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 KR 1108/20 | 06.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2106/21 | 25.01.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 12. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 10 KR 3746/19 | 21.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1922/21 | 25.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 2/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 12. Februar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 156 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 156 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 156 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SO 211/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-so-211-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-so-211-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 44/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-44-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-44-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 945/12 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-945-12-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-945-12-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 SO 153/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-so-153-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-so-153-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140335 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 SO 163/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-so-163-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-so-163-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 U 106/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-u-106-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-u-106-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 122/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-122-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-122-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 361/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-361-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-361-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131009 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 956/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-956-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-956-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 176/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-176-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-176-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 192/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-192-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-192-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 1449/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-1449-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-1449-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 1/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-1-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-1-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 377/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-377-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-377-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 460/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-460-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-460-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 98/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-98-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-98-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 878/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-878-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-878-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 181/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-181-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-181-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 217/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-217-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-217-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 618/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-618-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-618-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 290/22 KL ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-290-22-kl-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-290-22-kl-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KG 1/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kg-1-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kg-1-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 219/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-219-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-219-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 1108/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-1108-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-1108-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 3746/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-3746-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-3746-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SO 211/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-so-211-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:10:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:10:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-so-211-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 98ae4c5d2707dff36998198565d70972 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:015042aea74f5ea93cdc250081b08568:0.04104500 1747872402 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.