| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 KR 4078/19 | 21.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1820/21 | 08.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 12. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 410/21 | 16.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2941/21 | 25.01.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 12. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 863/21 ER | 23.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 4127/18 | 21.12.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 AS 84/22 ER | 13.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 1180/22 ER | 28.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 U 2450/21 | 06.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 5 AS 486/21 ER | 16.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 R 3558/16 | 25.02.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 KG 3744/20 | 24.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 KR 1460/22 | 02.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 KR 845/22 ER | 17.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 11. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 BA 2587/19 | 16.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 1167/21 | 17.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 U 2784/16 | 26.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3292/17 | 24.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 R 2450/18 | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3446/20 | 17.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 R 2996/19 | 23.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1669/20 | 09.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 R 777/19 | 16.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 768/21 | 25.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 18 SB 479/19 | 11.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 4291/19 | 29.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 SB 5163/18 | 29.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 1841/21 | 28.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 R 3379/17 | 11.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1030/20 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 7 AS 2497/19 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 111/21 | 29.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 7 AS 2497/19 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 111/21 | 29.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 4 AL 277/19 | 24.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 3871/19 | 30.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 2728/17 | 14.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1328/19 | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 2980/17 | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 360/21 | 24.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Februar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 157 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 157 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 157 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133274 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 4078/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-4078-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-4078-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 410/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-410-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-410-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 863/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-863-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-863-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SO 4127/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-so-4127-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-so-4127-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 84/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-84-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-84-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 1180/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-1180-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-1180-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 2450/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-2450-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-2450-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 486/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-486-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-486-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 3558/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-3558-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-3558-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KG 3744/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kg-3744-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kg-3744-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 KR 1460/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-kr-1460-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-kr-1460-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 845/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-845-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-845-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158479 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 1167/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-1167-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-1167-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158474 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3292/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3292-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3292-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3446/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3446-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3446-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1669/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1669-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1669-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 768/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-768-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:57:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:57:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-768-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 4291/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-4291-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-4291-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158453 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 1841/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-1841-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-1841-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1030/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1030-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1030-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 111/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-111-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-111-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 111/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-111-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-111-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 3871/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-3871-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-3871-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1328/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1328-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1328-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 360/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-360-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:56:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:56:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-360-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133274 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 4078/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-4078-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-4078-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 922bb45a05359ad5f980f0d2d46d51f0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b56380baae2875cadfb3a43df1c9c9dd:0.42511400 1747871729 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.