Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 347/23 | 08.10.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 22. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 19 R 64/23 | 17.10.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 548/23 | 16.05.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 21. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2387/22 | 01.10.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 21. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 561/22 | 24.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 2479/23 | 19.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 SF 1069/24 E | 25.06.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 2058/24 E-B | 03.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1060/24 | 27.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 KO 389/20 | 21.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 1946/20 B | 04.08.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KO 3665/22 | 17.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 662/24 B | 02.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 2110/24 | 21.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 2115/24 | 02.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 U 83/20 | 29.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2287/22 | 29.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 46 KR 696/20 | 11.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 727/22 KH | 15.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 24 KR 472/24 ER | 01.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 500/24 B ER | 08.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 25 BA 32/21 | 20.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 99/22 B | 14.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 7 KR 433/21 | 20.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 1137/23 | 10.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 17 KR 551/22 | 25.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 551/22 | 10.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 466/16 | 06.02.0218 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 347/22 KH | 10.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 37 R 64/23 | 05.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 789/23 | 07.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 7 AS 405/18 | 15.08.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2069/22 | 28.08.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 15/24 | 26.09.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 42 KR 424/19 | 18.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 128/21 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 17 R 2373/15 | 19.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 221/17 | 22.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 2111/21 | 23.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2170/23 | 17.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 309/23 | 04.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2962/23 | 23.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Oktober 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 16 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 16 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 16 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 347/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-347-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-347-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 R 64/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-r-64-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-r-64-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140154 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2387/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2387-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2387-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 2479/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-2479-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-2479-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 2058/24 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-2058-24-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-2058-24-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161053 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1060/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1060-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1060-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 1946/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-1946-20-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-1946-20-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161049 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 662/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-662-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-662-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 2110/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-2110-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-2110-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161045 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 2115/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-2115-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-2115-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2287/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2287-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2287-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 727/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-727-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-727-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 500/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-500-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-500-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 99/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-99-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-99-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1137/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1137-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1137-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 551/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-551-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-551-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 347/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-347-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-347-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 789/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-789-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-789-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140379 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AS 405/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-as-405-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-as-405-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2069/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2069-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2069-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 15/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-15-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-15-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 128/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-128-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-128-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 221/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-221-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-221-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2170/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2170-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2170-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2962/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2962-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2962-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 347/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-347-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-347-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f6ffe295b87580f59d65601740348365 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1579c61178a28f2155ae3ab145aaf710:0.37097000 1745080721 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.