| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 21 BA 106/21 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 BA 110/22 B | 26.01.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 AS 683/19 | 19.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1978/19 | 16.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 AS 3991/18 | 22.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 457/19 | 16.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 AS 83/17 | 19.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1976/19 | 16.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 AS 4332/17 | 19.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1977/19 | 16.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 SB 1338/16 | 10.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 SB 302/18 | 12.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 40/22 B | 12.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 2 SO 396/18 | 25.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 160/19 | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 72/22 BH | 05.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 AS 4270/19 | 09.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1229/20 | 16.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 SB 1338/16 | 10.09.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 8. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 KR 618/17 | 26.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 129/20 | 02.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 26/22 B | 16.01.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 8. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 KR 3946/18 | 02.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 523/20 | 02.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 2/21 R | 18.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 4 AL 206/16 | 04.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 139/19 | 31.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 32/21 R | 22.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 3 KR 98/14 | 13.05.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 140/16 | 22.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 15/20 R | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 15 U 107/05 | 26.06.2008 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 90/08 | 19.04.2012 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 12 R 412/16 | 12.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 172/20 | 26.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 39 AS 305/14 | 15.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 86/16 | 13.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 25 KR 143/22 ER | 11.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 72/22 B ER | 08.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 19 AS 987/19 | 08.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 14/22 NZB | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 34 SF 123/18 E | 11.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 292/20 B | 02.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 R 167/17 | 20.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 292/22 B | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 23 U 85/18 | 12.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 31/21 | 10.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 88/18 | 23.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 87/20 | 10.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 KG 4/20 | 10.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KG 2/20 | 21.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 KG 4/20 | 10.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KG 2/20 | 21.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 BA 71/21 | 30.11.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 107/22 B PKH | 30.01.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Februar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 160 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 160 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 160 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 3975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 110/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-110-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-110-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1978/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1978-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1978-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 457/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-457-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-457-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1976/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1976-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1976-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1977/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1977-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1977-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SB 302/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sb-302-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sb-302-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 160/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-160-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-160-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148744 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1229/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1229-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1229-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SB 1338/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sb-1338-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sb-1338-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 129/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-129-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-129-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 32/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-32-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-32-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 15/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-15-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-15-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 90/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-90-08-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-90-08-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 172/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-172-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-172-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 86/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-86-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-86-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 72/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-72-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-72-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 14/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-14-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-14-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 292/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-292-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-292-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 292/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-292-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-292-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 31/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-31-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-31-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 87/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-87-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:47:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:47:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-87-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KG 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kg-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kg-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KG 2/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kg-2-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kg-2-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 107/22 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-107-22-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-107-22-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 110/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-110-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-110-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8b49678efdef099b178a280aaeb0b4e9 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d2e9b5ae87e8e6f1038e1c36abfe52c8:0.94448300 1747909929 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.