| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 107 AS 3746/22 ER | 25.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 929/22 B ER | 01.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 62 SO 148/14 | 15.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 441/18 | 02.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 15/22 B | 06.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 U 192/19 | 19.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 6. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 16 KR 26/22 ER | 06.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 549/22 B ER | 20.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 48 AS 741/21 | 01.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 281/22 B | 12.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 3 U 92/17 | 18.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 61/19 | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 27 AS 11/15 | 19.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 272/19 | 14.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 18 AS 560/18 | 23.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 106/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 12 P 26/17 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 P 54/20 | 27.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 2 SB 40/19 | 03.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SB 97/20 | 11.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 34 BA 32/22 ER | 29.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 49/22 B ER | 22.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 2 U 22/20 | 05.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 U 17/22 | 25.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SF 5/22 EK AS | 02.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 86 KR 2589/18 | 18.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16/4 KR 536/19 | 15.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 148/15 | 10.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 29/19 | 28.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 10 KR 121/16 | 28.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 312/22 | 01.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 10 KR 121/16 | 28.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 312/22 | 01.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 34 R 83/20 | 23.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 159/21 | 24.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 37 AS 1268/19 | 16.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 505/21 | 21.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 10 BA 67/18 | 21.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 BA 91/19 | 18.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 20 AY 17/18 | 05.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AY 55/21 | 03.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 377/14 | 14.04.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 11/21 EK AS | 24.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 1/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 6. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 377/14 | 14.04.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 11/21 EK AS | 24.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 1/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 6. Februar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 928/21 | 12.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 6. Februar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 SO 52/21 | 23.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 SO 206/22 NZB | 25.01.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 6. Februar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 161 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 161 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 161 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 929/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-929-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-929-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 441/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-441-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-441-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 U 192/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-u-192-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-u-192-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 549/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-549-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-549-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 281/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-281-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-281-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 61/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-61-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-61-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 272/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-272-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-272-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 106/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-106-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-106-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 P 54/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-p-54-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-p-54-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 97/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-97-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-97-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 49/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-49-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-49-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 17/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-17-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-17-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SF 5/22 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sf-5-22-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sf-5-22-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16/4 KR 536/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-4-kr-536-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-4-kr-536-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-29-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-29-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 312/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-312-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-312-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 312/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-312-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-312-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 159/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-159-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-159-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 505/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-505-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-505-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 91/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-91-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-91-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 55/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-55-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-55-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 11/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-11-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-11-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 11/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-11-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-11-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 928/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-928-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-928-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 SO 52/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-so-52-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-so-52-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 929/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-929-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-929-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 7384d5e76a4f5bdaf751f9ccc06f0a3a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6684372e6451efd672635e00143c9792:0.83898300 1747910105 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.